UnUndead

Profile
Friends
Compliments (0)
Contributions (315)

Page Contributions
| Thread Contributions (259)

This report displays all thread contributions made by UnUndead.

1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last

	thread	Location	Contribution Date	Replies	Last Post
	RE: Child zombies the most dangerious zombies?	Discussion Forum	Sep 6 2008, 4:39 PM EDT	31	Sep 7 2008, 6:20 PM EDT by Kaikelx
Reply: Tiny zombies would be able to fit into more places, thus giving them an easier time getting to you. They could walk through a view reply
	RE: What if the Water Supply is Infected?	Zombie Survival & Defense Wiki	Aug 13 2008, 11:54 PM EDT	60	Oct 17 2008, 5:16 PM EDT by AgEnT_GrEEn
Reply: Boiling for ~thirty minutes will kill any and all life in your water. It won't remove radiation or chemicals, though. view reply
	RE: Being clean?	Hygenics and Overall Survival	Aug 10 2008, 2:56 PM EDT	45	Nov 30 2008, 4:43 PM EST by Blood_Type_11A
Reply: Yeah, you really don't need to shower. As a small child I would go without bathing for months at a time, and the same view reply
	RE: The palisade	Mass Warfare Tactics	Aug 9 2008, 11:29 PM EDT	7	Aug 10 2008, 6:06 PM EDT by tacticalplanner
Reply: Good point. view reply
	RE: A historical arguement for Raiding	The Argument Against Raiding	Aug 9 2008, 6:48 PM EDT	232	Aug 24 2008, 4:15 PM EDT by SkipNChurch
Reply: Take advantage of any religion they follow. Convince them that they are going against their religion if they don't follow your orders. Also promise view reply
	RE: A historical arguement for Raiding	The Argument Against Raiding	Aug 9 2008, 6:42 PM EDT	232	Aug 24 2008, 4:15 PM EDT by SkipNChurch
Reply: That is, Kaikelx is right. We really shouldn't have gone on for four pages about this on a thread. view reply
	RE: A historical arguement for Raiding	The Argument Against Raiding	Aug 9 2008, 6:37 PM EDT	232	Aug 24 2008, 4:15 PM EDT by SkipNChurch
Reply: You're right. I apologize for wasting the time of anyone interested in raiding. Jack, if you want to continue this so much, message view reply
	RE: A historical arguement for Raiding	The Argument Against Raiding	Aug 9 2008, 6:25 PM EDT	232	Aug 24 2008, 4:15 PM EDT by SkipNChurch
Reply: I'll stop when you stop. No sooner. This is an argument about a very vital part of being a person, and as a person view reply
	RE: A historical arguement for Raiding	The Argument Against Raiding	Aug 9 2008, 6:23 PM EDT	232	Aug 24 2008, 4:15 PM EDT by SkipNChurch
Reply: Just a note, we keep missing your points. Maybe you should think about making your posts clearer and leaving less room for interpretation. view reply
	RE: A historical arguement for Raiding	The Argument Against Raiding	Aug 9 2008, 6:22 PM EDT	232	Aug 24 2008, 4:15 PM EDT by SkipNChurch
Reply: You have failed to disprove my final proof. Those definitions are widely accepted by English speakers, and my conclusion follows logically from the three view reply
	RE: A historical arguement for Raiding	The Argument Against Raiding	Aug 9 2008, 5:36 PM EDT	232	Aug 24 2008, 4:15 PM EDT by SkipNChurch
Reply: Since we can both be proven right, let us drop it. You're right, I'm right. I'm happy, and you should be happy, too. Truce? view reply
	RE: A historical arguement for Raiding	The Argument Against Raiding	Aug 9 2008, 5:35 PM EDT	232	Aug 24 2008, 4:15 PM EDT by SkipNChurch
Reply: What gives you the right to determine whether or not my view is complete? I simply have not explained it fully, because it would view reply
	RE: A historical arguement for Raiding	The Argument Against Raiding	Aug 9 2008, 4:59 PM EDT	232	Aug 24 2008, 4:15 PM EDT by SkipNChurch
Reply: You have more intellectual might than me, so you are right. I cannot disprove your correctness because your intellectual might is so much greater view reply
	RE: A historical arguement for Raiding	The Argument Against Raiding	Aug 9 2008, 3:56 PM EDT	232	Aug 24 2008, 4:15 PM EDT by SkipNChurch
Reply: Remember that there are many forms of might, not just military. Another form is intellectual might. Whoever has more of this is more likely view reply
	RE: A historical arguement for Raiding	The Argument Against Raiding	Aug 9 2008, 3:48 PM EDT	232	Aug 24 2008, 4:15 PM EDT by SkipNChurch
Reply: Moral objectivists believe there is a clearly defined and unalterable set of moral rules, separate from and immune to human tampering. So really you view reply
	RE: Great Story!	Bill: His Story	Aug 9 2008, 3:12 PM EDT	4	Aug 9 2008, 3:12 PM EDT by UnUndead
Reply: Awesome! view reply
	RE: The palisade	Mass Warfare Tactics	Aug 9 2008, 3:08 PM EDT	7	Aug 10 2008, 6:06 PM EDT by tacticalplanner
Reply: These would be useful. A zombie impaled on a stake would be practically immobile, and much easier to snipe than a moving one. view reply
	RE: A historical arguement for Raiding	The Argument Against Raiding	Aug 9 2008, 2:58 PM EDT	232	Aug 24 2008, 4:15 PM EDT by SkipNChurch
Reply: If you fucking killed me as I tried to raid you, it would be quite obvious you had more might than me. That's not view reply
	RE: Great Story!	Bill: His Story	Aug 9 2008, 2:51 PM EDT	4	Aug 9 2008, 3:12 PM EDT by UnUndead
Reply: Very interesting start! I hope to see Bill make a few (if not a few more) genuine mistakes that have actual consequences. I'm tired view reply
	RE: A historical arguement for Raiding	The Argument Against Raiding	Aug 9 2008, 2:40 PM EDT	232	Aug 24 2008, 4:15 PM EDT by SkipNChurch
Reply: Kick-ass war cry, right there. "Blargh! Die zombies! BLARGH!" view reply

1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last

21 of UnUndead's threads have been deleted.

JavaScript must be enabled in order for you to contribute to this site.
To start contributing, enable JavaScript by changing your browser options, then try again.

Site pages

Home

Top Contributors