WGSF

WGSF id=
Role: Registered User (what's this?

Registered users can join discussions and leave comments.

Read more about site and user permissions on this site at Wetpaint Central.

)
Member since: Jun 17 2009, 6:35 PM EDT
Slogan: Hope For The Best, Prepare For The Worst
Friends: 3
Compliments: 1 compliments by 1 members
Love your profile!1


About Me:
When I started thinking way too much about zombies: 2008
What started my zombie fixation: The Zombie Survival Guide
Favorite zombie book: World War Z
Favorite zombie movie: 28 Days Later
Favorite quote in any zombie movie: "I'm here to chew bubble gum and kick ass, and I am all outta bubble gum!"

Zombie Decomposition

When classifying zombies, perhaps the state of decay could (or should) play a factor. For at least the first couple hours, those freshly killed and/or re-animated are going to possess most of the speed and strength as the living until rigor mortis and decay take over. As such, we could term this first type to be "Runners," and they would perhaps be the most dangerous.

Next would be the average run-of-the-mill, shambling, slow-moving zombie. Decay and/or non-lethal attacks will have slowed their movement and reduced their strength, but they are nevertheless still very dangerous and very capable of spreading the virus. These types could be termed "Shamblers" or something similar.

The final class of zombie would be the weakest. Decay will have severely handicapped the zombie, and perhaps even withered it to just a chomping skull. It would be too weak to cause any real damage (or possibly even move), but, again, still able to spread the virus if someone was careless enough. Perhaps these could be named something along the lines of "Rotters" or some such.


My score and score summary on the non-lame zombie survival test:



Latest page update: Oct 5 2009, 8:34 PM EDT