How The Infection Will UnfoldThis is a featured page

This page has been deleted by PedroAsani.

To restore this page, please contact a site moderator.


PedroAsani
PedroAsani
Latest page update: made by PedroAsani , Dec 5 2009, 1:43 PM EST (about this update About This Update PedroAsani Edited by PedroAsani

No content added or deleted.

- complete history)
More Info: links to this page
Started By Thread Subject Replies Last Post
FrenchLegion Believability of "Rage" virus (page: 1 2) 39 Jan 8 2011, 2:59 AM EST by RUPREPARED
Thread started: Oct 27 2009, 10:25 AM EDT  Watch
I don't see how the Rage virus is any more realistic than other Z-viruses. There is no way a virus can take hold that fast without at least a minimal incubation period. Look at Morningstar, the virus that creates Sprinters and later Shamblers. The least amount of time it takes to take effect is 45 minutes, and that's if someone is traumatically introduced to the virus. Otherwise, it usually takes a week.

In fact, there is no zombie that is the most "realistic". Although I understand that living people "raging" infected by a virus is more believable than undead, nearly-indestructible zombies, the Rage virus is, to me, the LEAST unrealistic of any Z-virus.

If you really think that a virus like Rage can happen that fully infects people within 5-30 seconds, than I can say that undead zombies can happen.
Show Last Reply
PatientZeroSurvivor On credibility 2 Oct 29 2009, 8:05 PM EDT by spamanninen
Thread started: Oct 29 2009, 12:42 PM EDT  Watch
This article isn't concerned with the believability of any virus. It assumes that a particular virus IS true, and HAS happened, and then describes the course of events that follow, using as much logic as possible and in other places giving reasons why.
Everyone has their own opinions about how realistic the scenarios are, but that's discussed in another article! ;)
Show Last Reply
Chicago_Ted Mental compacity 6 Oct 26 2009, 5:04 AM EDT by Chicago_Ted
Thread started: Oct 26 2009, 3:50 AM EDT  Watch
This article is very good. I think you make quite accurate judgments about the consequences of a large-scale outbreak.

However, jmc95's statement about us using only 10% of our brain capacity is mis-informed. It is a myth that we use a fraction of our brains. All parts of the brain are always being used (at variable levels) even during sleep.
Show Last Reply
Showing 3 of 3 threads for this page

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)