It was asked on the IRC today, "How can zombies live without the heart pumping blood?" And at first, it seems like it is a big hole in the zombie mythos. After all, everything needs a heart to live, right?
Well no. What is more accurate is that everything needs energy to live. How that energy is obtained doesn't matter. And once you understand this, you can begin to see how a zombie can come into being.
First, you start off with the usual limits of human physiology. For anything to change this, it is going to take time. For anything small, such as a bacteria or virus, it is going to take a long time. A pathogen, be it bacteria, parasite, virus or prion, is going to need to invade the host. Then it is going to need to multiply, and spread or travel to the infection control point. Usually the brain and spine.
Now, during that infection period, the pathogen is not only mutliplying and migrating. It is changing things in the host, in order for the host to become the zombie. What those changes are, and how they come about, that varies depending on the archetype. But what if one thing that is changed, is how the cells in the body get the energy they require.
Here we are going to dip into Avogadro and Einstein. You will see why.
Take hydrogen. It is the smallest atom. The atomic weight is 1.0079g. Divide that by Avogadros number and we have the weight of a single atom. So 1.0079g / 6.0221415 x 10^23. That would be known as m.
Next, we deal with something big. The speed of light. Squared. 8.98755191 x 10^20 cm^2/s^2. That is c^2.
So E = mc^2. In the case of the single hydrogen atom, that would be 0.0000000001504208 Joules.
Seems a really small number, right? Well for the whole human body for one day, you need about 9400 Joules to move, think, breathe, etc. Zombies won't be using all these functions, but I will calculate as if they are, just to make it harder.
To get that 9400 joules, we need 62,491,357,578,208 atoms. And how many atoms are there in a single cell? Well the rough estimate is 7,000,000,000,000,000 atoms. So, in order to power a zombie for one day, we need less than 1% of a single cell, if that cell contains the smallest (and therefore least energy-containing) atoms. In fact, we can use a single cell to power the body for 112 days.
Now, there is still an issue delivering this energy all around the body. That is what blood is usually used for, and by making the heart redundant, we can't do that. But with so many cells to strip down, we don't actually need to do that at all. Take apart the cells slowly, all over the body, and the zombie literally feeds on itself. Bonus, any flesh it eats can be "digested" in the same fashion. Rather than slowly broken down by enzymes and acids, it is stripped apart at the molecular level. Anything unused would look untouched, much as in many archetypes.
|
|
|
Mutant Zombies
|
14 |
Aug 20 2012, 7:59 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Jul 3 2012, 10:06 AM EDT
Watch
The mutant zombie is a common feature in zombie media. In Day by Day Armegeddan, zombies affected by radiation are smarter and stronger than regular ones. In rot & ruin it is a genetics thing. What would mutant zombies look like? How would they act? What causes it? Do zombies get cancer? What about weird abilities like blowing up when destroyed?
7
out of
8 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
Show Last Reply
|
|
Last Reply:
RE: Mutant Zombies
By: ,
Aug 20 2012, 7:59 PM EDT
"Ah so your post is on a subset of more intellegent zombies with more functioning brain matter. Those are plauseable, lol all that zombies can be is plausable as they don't exist. Something had reactivated the brain it is totally possible that the unknown item which reactivates the brain would have more of an effect on some and less on others.
The age of the base person would also play a huge roll in the intellegence of a zombie. The brain becomes more complex as you age and as neurons die off and interconnections are formed so an middle aged zombie would be more intellegent than say a 16 year old Zombie as more interconections between the neurons exist in the older brain." also, the human body at max can take 3 times it's weight. so a zombie could be slightly stronger than the average human.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting, but I must disagree
|
7 |
Jun 29 2012, 5:41 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Jun 9 2012, 10:32 PM EDT
Watch
This is an interesting theory, but once you look at it a little bit deeper it does fall apart. What your talking about is nuclear energy, created when mass is converted into energy, and the only know process for doing that is either nuclear fission, or more efficiently fusion.
First off, neither of these processes convert the mass wholly into energy, the energy is more of a by-product. For example the fusion of tritium and deuterium (the two easiest fused hydrogen atoms, and most energy producing) only convert one neutron into energy. And this requires enormous amounts of energy to obtain. The force repelling the atoms must be overcome, wich requires extreme heat and pressure.
In order to convert mass wholly into energy (a process never known to have happened, not since the big bang) would require anti matter, wich is essentially matter with the opposite charge. The collision of matter and anti matter converts both into pure energy.
This however, could never take place inside of a human body, and even if it could, the energy would be uncontrollable. And all you would end up with is a singed zombie, not a walking one.
5
out of
5 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
Show Last Reply
|
|
Last Reply:
RE: Physics of ever-living zombies. I must disagree.
By: ,
Jun 29 2012, 5:41 PM EDT
"Actually all elements are capable of fission. " You misunderstand what fission is, the flow of electrons has nothing to do with fission, fission is the splitting of atoms. All elements are capable but only elements heavier than iron produce more energy than they require when their nucleus is split, the decay of radioactive isotopes is something completely different than fission. The gasoline was an example to show a concept, not to be taken literally as drinking gasoline is ridiculous, it's to show that different kinds of energy can not be used interchangably. No amount of physiological change would allow you to transform the heat from nuclear reactions into chemical energy wich the body requires. To recap, the decay of radioactive isotopes is not in fact nuclear fission, the reason it's call nuclear is the nucleus of the atom splits, and only elements lighter than iron produce energy when their nucleus is split. All of this is only adding on to the fact that even if nuclear reactions could take place in the body, it would take internal steam powered turbines to harness it. Combustion and fission are absolutely unrelated. Combustion is a chemical reaction in wich an element bonds with oxygen. It happens every day. Rust is in fact slow combustion. Fission is the splitting of an atoms nucleus, no chemical reaction takes place, they aren't on the same scale so one is not an "order of magnitude" above the other For example, when a hydrocarbon (chains of carbon attached to hydrogen) burns, the oxygen in the air splits up the carbon and hydrogen, forming bonds with both to form carbon dioxide and hidrogen dioxide (water). When a uranium nucleus is split it destroys the uranium atom, splitting it into two or more lighter elements, hence, totally different reactions. It is akin to comparing a physical change (for example cutting an apple) and a chemical change (burning gasoline)
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
Showing 2 of 2 threads for this page