|
Dec 12 2009, 5:10 PM EST
|
|
|
delete |
No content added or deleted. |
|
Change: Deleted by Dec 12 2009, 5:10 PM EST for: no reason given
|
|
Nov 14 2009, 2:03 PM EST
|
|
|
edit |
2 words added
4 words deleted
11 images deleted
|
|
Change: skin jobs),zombies), the militry will forcibly, if necessary, take over and shut down the plants (that’s one of the leftover effects of Cold War-Era “Mutual Assured Destruction” thinking).And stop the doom-and-gloom speak that has nothing to do with
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1415)
|
|
May 6 2009, 5:08 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
28 words added
|
|
Change: most reactors will live 50 to 70 years before anyone will need to worry about radiation leaks... browncoat117: i agree nuclear power plants have fail safes that shut them down automatically (and sereiousley how is the power going to go out at a power station)
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1417)
|
|
Jan 31 2009, 6:47 PM EST
|
|
|
edit |
115 words added
|
|
Change: After a few days of more conventional powerplants going unmanned (coal, gas, wood, trash) they will start running out and shutting down. The escalating draw on the nuclear plants will cause them to enter a safe mode and effectively shutting down... This means NO boom NO radiation leaks
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1389)
|
|
Sep 29 2008, 8:05 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
140 words added
|
|
Change: Lucifer'sHammer: I'd be less worried about Nuclear Reactors that Nuclear Bombs. The Nuclear Reactor at Three Mile Island barely released anything at all and look
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1274)
|
|
Sep 19 2008, 10:22 PM EDT
|
Andering_J_REDDSON
|
|
edit |
137 words added
1 image added
1 image deleted
|
|
Change: Further, as a mass-level disaster occurs, reactor staff will in all likelihood shut the reactor down themselves; In the event they ARE the problem (that
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1124)
|
|
Aug 9 2008, 3:53 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
|
|
Change: There were only format changes (bold, italics, etc.) in this version. See this version for details.
(Word count: 978)
|
|
Aug 9 2008, 3:49 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
1 image added
|
|
Change: There were only format changes (bold, italics, etc.) in this version. See this version for details.
(Word count: 978)
|
|
Jul 22 2008, 3:49 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
52 words added
|
|
Change: ZOMG! (I think it means zombie OMG!) NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS HAVE SOMETHING THAT MAKES RADIATION GOES UNDERGROUND O.O OMG! But it can also seeeeeeeeep through
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 978)
|
|
Jul 14 2008, 11:47 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
9 words deleted
10 images added
|
|
Change: SuperSoldierRCP- says BOMB BOMB BOMB BOMB BOMB BOMB BOOMGladimnotdaonly1 - I was thinking more along the lines of nuclear power plants with reactors and cooling pools not being monitored. 5% of Chernobyl's core produced enough radiation to contaminate the Northern
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 922)
|
|
Jul 12 2008, 12:43 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
80 words added
23 words deleted
|
|
Change: bushwaker10:this oddly enough provides us with an advantage instead of a disadvantage. more than likely, the radiation released should be equivalent to some type of
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 931)
|
|
Jul 12 2008, 12:40 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
23 words added
|
|
Change: Thank god I live in Australia - we only have one reactor in the whole country, and it's only used for scientific purposes.Mehillus: thank god i live in northern Canada.....Dooran: Around here (Canada) we use CANDU reactors. The reaction
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 872)
|
|
Jul 11 2008, 10:34 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
2 words added
2 words deleted
|
|
Change: mabyemaybe the power plant itself will be contaminated, but there is little chance that these particular reactersreactors will explode.Biohazardouswithin: Almost all of the worlds active Nuclear power plants use an RPS (Reactor Protective
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 849)
|
|
Jul 11 2008, 10:12 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
112 words added
|
|
Change: Power", a balancing between High nuclear power and a temperature level; "High Startup Rate" Activated below 10-4 percent power; "High Pressurizer Pressure"; "Low Reactor Coolant
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 849)
|
|
Jul 8 2008, 7:59 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
89 words added
|
|
Change: Dooran: Around here (Canada) we use CANDU reactors. The reaction is controlled by heavy water, but when that water is gone, the reaction ends. It
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 734)
|
|
Jul 8 2008, 12:43 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
1 word added
1 word deleted
|
|
Change: over 60 years experience with them).Quickrace89: I'm guessing that there would be fail-safes that don't depend on electricity, hell, if we can think of stuff like that, I'm sure a $200,000 government guy can.Mehillus: thank god i live in northern canada.....Canada.....
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 645)
|
|
Jun 13 2008, 2:25 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
29 words added
|
|
Change: had over 60 years experience with them). Quickrace89: I'm guessing that there would be fail-safes that don't depend on electricity, hell, if we can think of stuff like that, I'm sure a $200,000 government guy can.Mehillus: thank god i live in northern canada.....
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 645)
|
|
Jun 11 2008, 3:58 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
8 words added
|
|
Change: hope that the people there know how to turn their reactors off, they have had over 60 years experience with them). Mehillus: thank god i live in northern canada.....
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 611)
|
|
Jun 1 2008, 9:10 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
46 words added
|
|
Change: remain realistic. Thrawn5:I would say head for WA. (where I live), we only have a couple of reactors and they are all at Hanford (I should hope that the people there know how to turn their reactors off, they have had over 60 years experience with them).
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 603)
|
|
May 20 2008, 2:32 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
88 words added
6 words deleted
|
|
Change: Wow...I had not thought of this at all. This will certainly change some plans. Hopefully someone with some sort of nuclear authority already thought of
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 557)
|