|
Sep 29 2008, 8:05 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
140 words added
|
|
Change: Lucifer'sHammer: I'd be less worried about Nuclear Reactors that Nuclear Bombs. The Nuclear Reactor at Three Mile Island barely released anything at all and look
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1274)
|
|
Sep 19 2008, 10:22 PM EDT
|
Andering_J_REDDSON
|
|
edit |
137 words added
1 image added
1 image deleted
|
|
Change: Further, as a mass-level disaster occurs, reactor staff will in all likelihood shut the reactor down themselves; In the event they ARE the problem (that
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1124)
|
|
Aug 9 2008, 3:53 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
|
|
Change: There were only format changes (bold, italics, etc.) in this version. See this version for details.
(Word count: 978)
|
|
Aug 9 2008, 3:49 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
1 image added
|
|
Change: There were only format changes (bold, italics, etc.) in this version. See this version for details.
(Word count: 978)
|
|
Jul 22 2008, 3:49 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
52 words added
|
|
Change: ZOMG! (I think it means zombie OMG!) NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS HAVE SOMETHING THAT MAKES RADIATION GOES UNDERGROUND O.O OMG! But it can also seeeeeeeeep through
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 978)
|
|
Jul 14 2008, 11:47 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
9 words deleted
10 images added
|
|
Change: SuperSoldierRCP- says BOMB BOMB BOMB BOMB BOMB BOMB BOOMGladimnotdaonly1 - I was thinking more along the lines of nuclear power plants with reactors and cooling pools not being monitored. 5% of Chernobyl's core produced enough radiation to contaminate the Northern
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 922)
|
|
Jul 12 2008, 12:43 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
80 words added
23 words deleted
|
|
Change: bushwaker10:this oddly enough provides us with an advantage instead of a disadvantage. more than likely, the radiation released should be equivalent to some type of
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 931)
|
|
Jul 12 2008, 12:40 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
23 words added
|
|
Change: Thank god I live in Australia - we only have one reactor in the whole country, and it's only used for scientific purposes.Mehillus: thank god i live in northern Canada.....Dooran: Around here (Canada) we use CANDU reactors. The reaction
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 872)
|
|
Jul 11 2008, 10:34 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
2 words added
2 words deleted
|
|
Change: mabyemaybe the power plant itself will be contaminated, but there is little chance that these particular reactersreactors will explode.Biohazardouswithin: Almost all of the worlds active Nuclear power plants use an RPS (Reactor Protective
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 849)
|
|
Jul 11 2008, 10:12 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
112 words added
|
|
Change: Power", a balancing between High nuclear power and a temperature level; "High Startup Rate" Activated below 10-4 percent power; "High Pressurizer Pressure"; "Low Reactor Coolant
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 849)
|
|
Jul 8 2008, 7:59 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
89 words added
|
|
Change: Dooran: Around here (Canada) we use CANDU reactors. The reaction is controlled by heavy water, but when that water is gone, the reaction ends. It
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 734)
|
|
Jul 8 2008, 12:43 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
1 word added
1 word deleted
|
|
Change: over 60 years experience with them).Quickrace89: I'm guessing that there would be fail-safes that don't depend on electricity, hell, if we can think of stuff like that, I'm sure a $200,000 government guy can.Mehillus: thank god i live in northern canada.....Canada.....
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 645)
|
|
Jun 13 2008, 2:25 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
29 words added
|
|
Change: had over 60 years experience with them). Quickrace89: I'm guessing that there would be fail-safes that don't depend on electricity, hell, if we can think of stuff like that, I'm sure a $200,000 government guy can.Mehillus: thank god i live in northern canada.....
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 645)
|
|
Jun 11 2008, 3:58 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
8 words added
|
|
Change: hope that the people there know how to turn their reactors off, they have had over 60 years experience with them). Mehillus: thank god i live in northern canada.....
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 611)
|
|
Jun 1 2008, 9:10 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
46 words added
|
|
Change: remain realistic. Thrawn5:I would say head for WA. (where I live), we only have a couple of reactors and they are all at Hanford (I should hope that the people there know how to turn their reactors off, they have had over 60 years experience with them).
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 603)
|
|
May 20 2008, 2:32 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
88 words added
6 words deleted
|
|
Change: Wow...I had not thought of this at all. This will certainly change some plans. Hopefully someone with some sort of nuclear authority already thought of
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 557)
|
|
May 19 2008, 9:30 PM EDT
|
BanditJack
|
|
edit |
248 words added
|
|
Change: It's not so much the plant, but the nuclear waste it produces. The waste has to be stored in cooling pools, so that they don't
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 467)
|
|
May 17 2008, 11:03 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
65 words added
|
|
Change: Zuzak: I would assume that the power plants would simply stop working, instead of exploding. The power would only go out when the generator stopped
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 212)
|
|
May 14 2008, 9:55 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
66 words added
|
|
Change: Once the power goes out, the failsafes that keep nuclear reactors at a cool, stable temperature will have less than a week before the reactors
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 147)
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 7:28 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
63 words added
1 image added
|
|
Change: not being monitored. 5% of Chernobyl's core produced enough radiation to contaminate the Northern Hemisphere. And look at how many plants we have. As of 1999 there were 436 plants in 32 countries, 104 of which were in the United States. Map courtesy of http://www.pro-resources.net/nuclear-power-plant.html
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 80)
|