Already a member?
Sign in
Location: Thinking Nuclear
Threads
???keywordTags???
???noTags???
Posting...
Note: You can enter up to [REMCHARS] additional characters.
Did you know you can edit the content of this page by clicking EasyEdit?
Did you know you can edit the content of this page by clicking EasyEdit?
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andering_J_REDDSON | Stop. Panicking. | 7 | Friday, 2:57 AM EST by John_234 | |||
|
Thread started: Aug 9 2008, 1:57 PM EDT
Watch
Stop. Panicking. Really. Please stop.
Yes, there are certain dangers involved in the use of nuclear power, but that’s WHY there are the aforementioned failsafe; Those are what shut down the reactor in the event of a problem. Further, as a mass-level disaster occurs, reactor staff will in all likelihood shut the reactor down themselves; In the event they ARE the problem (that is, they’re skin jobs), the militry will forcibly, if necessary, take over and shut down the plants (that’s one of the leftover effects of Cold War-Era “Mutual Assured Destruction” thinking). Panic WILL kill; Calm will save your ass(ets).
4
out of
4 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
Keyword tags:
nuclear
power plants
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| ~Jack~ | No big boom | 1 | Sep 8 2008, 12:52 AM EDT by nightcreeper78 | |||
|
Thread started: Jul 27 2008, 10:52 AM EDT
Watch
There is something we need to keep in mind before we assume the worst.
The Nuclear explosion you guys have seen on television and the internet(the mushroom), were all man-made explosions. Meaning, they cannot happen unless we make them happen. AKA: make a bomb. Nuclear power-plants and nuclear bombs work very very very differently for each other. They may use the same stuff, but they work very differently. Okay? so, assuming that a nuclear reactor lost containment and went into melt down. There would be a lot of explosions, granted, but they will not be nuclear in nature. they will be other things exploding due to the heat and energy radiating from the nuclear fuel. Tons of radiation will be released into the atmosphere, and whatnot. But no big boom. At the end of the melt-down, the only thing that will happen to the uranium is that it will turn into lead. It may take thousands of years to do it, but it will all eventually turn into lead. Okay? There will be lots of radiation, but no big boom of doom. okay? Just wanted to be clear on this.
3
out of
4 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
Keyword tags:
nuclear
power plants
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| Gladimnotdaonly1 | Sorry about the confusion | 1 | Aug 9 2008, 1:42 PM EDT by ~Jack~ | |||
|
Thread started: Aug 9 2008, 4:00 AM EDT
Watch
I didn't add enough info, my fault. My concern wasn't for a "big boom" type disaster, but instead for the cooling rods being exposed as BanditJack stated. I meant Chernobyl to be a reference to how much radiation could leak into our atmosphere. I had done tons of research to add to this page but apparently some of my info didn't transfer as I had hoped. I'll do a scavanger hunt for the lost info. Sorry again.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Keyword tags:
nuclear
power plants
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
