Sign in or 

| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ShopsmartshopS-Mart | turrets (page: 1 2) | 20 | Nov 25 2009, 12:56 PM EST by Whybother08 | ||||
|
Thread started: Oct 27 2009, 10:57 PM EDT
Watch
And where do you plan to get an artillery gun from?
Show Last Reply
|
|||||||
| skullshooter | Turrets | 3 | Oct 26 2009, 7:57 PM EDT by billybob11 | ||||
|
Thread started: Oct 19 2009, 9:26 AM EDT
Watch
Turrets are great against swarms but transportation of them is hard plus where are you going to get one.
Show Last Reply
|
|||||||
| jonnymidd | i agree | 1 | Sep 20 2009, 4:20 AM EDT by StrykerPez | ||||
|
Thread started: Sep 20 2009, 4:04 AM EDT
Watch
tes
Show Last Reply
|
|||||||
| machetegreg | if only i could get one... | 13 | Aug 8 2009, 12:41 PM EDT by beowulf2700 | ||||
|
Thread started: Jul 12 2009, 11:01 PM EDT
Watch
nice thought, but who can find a working TURRET or ARTILERY? I'd like a spaceship and just leave the planet but that won't happen either
Show Last Reply
|
|||||||
| Diablo185 | Artillary VS Heavy Mounter Machineguns (page: 1 2 3 4) | 68 | Jun 29 2009, 6:11 PM EDT by John_234 | ||||
|
Thread started: Jul 2 2008, 1:57 PM EDT
Watch
The artillary is much better suited for combat against Zack. Even though, like Don-diego said, Artillary is used to destroy organs, they could also rip off their limbs, making it easier to fight them off when they do finally arrive. however, the machine gune are pretty much pointless. We don't need fancy weapons. We need something that's easy to use, easy to maintain, and effective. machine guns like thes are almost impossible to move unless they're mounted, and have very low accuracy. Now i admit, that it'd just be extremely satisfactory to rip through dozens of zed heds with an M134, but I don't really beleive that it'd help that much. If anything, it'd majke the battlefield littered with chunks of earth and flesh, making it more difficult to spot the crawlers. There'd also be even more crawlers, because the rounds would rip through the zed heds, tearing off their limbs, as well as the crawlers from the long-range artillary. Flashy is fun, and can boost morale, but aint worth shit
Show Last Reply
|
|||||||
| deathseekrakodo | A dream of a weapon on a dream of a vehicle (page: 1 2 3) | 46 | Jun 27 2009, 1:50 AM EDT by Reality_Check | ||||
|
Thread started: Jun 1 2009, 11:19 PM EDT
Watch
Ok....I saw a 3 page argument (you seen it to) about artillery vs mounted machine guns, well I have 2 cents. If we had the mobility and supplies enough to chose (20 years after, we have reorganized and what not). The Dillon minigun, found on many Blackhawks that are in our nations inventory, mounted on a heavy assault vehicle. Possibly something like a chevy gladiator van with a ramming block in front secured windows and the roof section of a humvee with the proper mounting for the weapon, covered by 2 off road dune buggies with 4 seats and a mounted m249 for gathering supplies in the abandoned cities of the world.
Show Last Reply
|
|||||||
| @@raoul | turets&mounted wepons | 2 | Feb 21 2009, 10:28 PM EST by Noobzy | ||||
|
Thread started: Feb 21 2009, 7:34 PM EST
Watch
awesome page nice pictures awesome descriptions.
Show Last Reply
|
|||||||
| Forewarned76 | Cannister and Grape anyone | 0 | Feb 21 2009, 3:44 AM EST by Forewarned76 | ||||
|
Thread started: Feb 21 2009, 3:44 AM EST
Watch
Check out all this artillery
http://blackpowder-cannons.com/ http://www.steencannons.com/ |
|||||||
| R&H | XM307/312 | 3 | Feb 14 2009, 8:40 PM EST by R&H | ||||
|
Thread started: Feb 14 2009, 3:48 AM EST
Watch
This page needs an XM307/312. The XM is the military's newest toy, which is a replacement for both the Mk. 19 and the .50 cal. The 307 is the grenade launcher version which fires 40mm grenades and has an air-burst function. The 312 is the .50 cal version which is more accurate and has less recoil than the M2 browning which is currently in service. The best part about this weapon platform, is that you can change from the 307 to the 312 in under two minutes. The entire weapon, plus the stand and telescopic sight weighs under fifty pounds, which is less than the Mk. 19 and the M2. Despite the fact that this is a crew served weapon, it is entirely possible for a single soldier to operate it even while not mounted on a vehicle.
Show Last Reply
|
|||||||
| Don-diego | well | 14 | Feb 13 2009, 12:41 AM EST by Carnack | ||||
|
Thread started: May 20 2008, 9:51 AM EDT
Watch
M2 can't be purchased in australia, we can't even buy semi auto rifles after the port Arthur massacre. in my opinion the mortar is a bad choice because like all are affect weapons were designed to take out major organs, not to make a direct hit into the skull, unless it's an incendiary area affect weapon, it's shit for killing zombies, same with the mark 19.
the robot with the two AA12's is an awesome idea though, and thanks for calling utes, utes, non of this pickup-truck nonsense, damn americans. and yes a holden V8 ute with a minigun would be awesome, but as if it isn't awesome without the minigun
2
out of
4 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
Keyword tags:
Weapons
Show Last Reply
|
|||||||
| thewhitezombie666 | russian gattling gun | 4 | Sep 26 2008, 11:07 AM EDT by Andering_J_REDDSON | ||||
|
Thread started: Sep 25 2008, 7:20 PM EDT
Watch
the russians made a gun 10,000 rpm 25mm and weighs 73 kgs. pretty awsome!
Show Last Reply
|
|||||||
| SuperAka | uuu | 0 | Aug 28 2008, 12:08 PM EDT by SuperAka | ||||
|
Thread started: Aug 28 2008, 12:08 PM EDT
Watch
Who has these weapons
|
|||||||