Thread started: Jun 23 2008, 12:42 PM EDT
Watch
I had an interesting thought a while ago. The premise of a zombie is that it is undead -- or being biologically dead, but behaving physically as a living organism. My thought was that because the "zombies" in 28 days/weeks fulfilled many of the characteristics of life, and that it is revealed in the end of 28 weeks that zombiism may be reversable, unlike death, then they may not be zombies after all. For example, they are supposed to starve to death after 5 weeks, which implies that they require food and water for something. Food in normal humans is used for cell regeneration, so the 28 days zombies would need to heal, grow, and develop. Tell me what you think.
8
out of
10 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
Show Last Reply
|
|
Last Reply:
RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
By:
Oct 15 2008, 9:52 AM EDT
"for all intensive purposes, let's just classify them as zombies, because you can't talk them down, they can't be reasoned with, an they want to trear your limbs out" I know, I already looked it up. A while ago, actually, but then my email screwed up and unwatched this thread.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
