Already a member?
Sign in
Location: America vs. Britain
Discussion: Canada
Keyword tags:
America vs. Britan
Watch
 deathvalley55 |
Canada
Feb 27 2008, 5:16 PM EST Canada, hands down. Doesn't matter how many sports equipment you guys have, we can just steer cleer of the cities and be alright. 6 out of 10 found this valuable. Do you? |
 Kayvaan |
RE: Canada
Feb 29 2008, 1:32 AM EST I guess your right, it can get pretty cold in Canada, and its right next to Alaska and Russia, both of which get pretty cold too, take a boat out to sea and since zombies freeze and can't swim Do you find this valuable? |
 Toomin |
RE: Canada
Feb 29 2008, 12:13 PM EST Canada would be a great choice. Population Density is only 3.2 people per km². Much lower than the UK at 246 people per km² or even USA at 31 people per km². It'd be really easy to steer clear of high-risk zones. However that also makes it very hard to control, so I think the Canadian government would have a hard time protecting any survivors. Do you find this valuable? |
 kingrich3 |
RE: Canada
Apr 6 2008, 7:48 PM EDT damn right. cold huge planty of wal marts us canadians have it made! Do you find this valuable? |
 Talon12 |
RE: Canada
Apr 7 2008, 10:44 PM EDT Survive Canada? The winters can be deadly by themselves with out Zeds and polar bear sex is over rated. More forepaw. lol.The wilderness is the most beautiful anywhere, well worth the trip. 0 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
kingrich3 |
RE: Canada
Apr 9 2008, 6:25 PM EDT zombies don't swim but they can float, or walk along the ocean floor Do you find this valuable? |
 DaveBall |
RE: Canada
May 7 2008, 5:57 PM EDT Canada would be a good place if you go out in the wilderness. But then you need to be skilled in survival. The same goes for any extreme weather conditions ( desert, island, ship, or wilderness ). But you will probably survive longer than in any large city.. Do you find this valuable? |
 McSkullcracken |
RE: Canada
May 7 2008, 9:37 PM EDT Canada could be a good idea, provided there aren't too many zombies spilling over from the populous U.S.A. More importantly, you need to know what you're doing. If you've read World War Z, you may remember what happened to the unprepared survivors who fled to Canada. The biggest killer was not the zombie hordes in this case. Do you find this valuable? |
 Sandbagger |
RE: Canada
May 9 2008, 6:13 PM EDT I remember that storyline, it was the only one that really freaked me out. Canada does have more open spaces, and less population density, but if your not prepared for the conditions, it would do you just as well to stay put and hold out as best you can. Do you find this valuable? |
|
DaveBall |
RE: Canada
May 15 2008, 9:34 AM EDT "Canada could be a good idea, provided there aren't too many zombies spilling over from the populous U.S.A. More importantly, you need to know what you're doing. If you've read World War Z, you may remember what happened to the unprepared survivors who fled to Canada. The biggest killer was not the zombie hordes in this case."Check a map. there are few major cities along the US and Canadian border. There are large spaces were there are no cities, towns, and few homes. Do you find this valuable? |
 Hell_Razor |
RE: Canada
May 15 2008, 5:39 PM EDT "Check a map. there are few major cities along the US and Canadian border. There are large spaces were there are no cities, towns, and few homes. "That may be true, but consider a large influx of refugees attempting to escape into the northern wilderness. People will be fleeing from as far south as Mexico. Like McSkullcracken said, World War Z describes this perfectly. Do you find this valuable? |
|
DaveBall |
RE: Canada
May 15 2008, 6:37 PM EDT Why would people be fleeing from the south. Why would mexicans go to Canada, It's to far. They can go south . Most of the people fleeing wont make it out of there towns. And if your all putting your entire ideology of survival on a piece of fiction from a guy who from what I have found on the NET has little to no survival experience. Let alone relying on Movies, Video games, or comics, then good luck to you while those of us who have live on. The hole idea your going to be able to move around at will is flawed. The roads will be cluttered with abandoned cars. Do you find this valuable? |
 StrykerPez |
RE: Canada
May 15 2008, 6:52 PM EDT A good place to go will be determined when the S hits the F. Maybe its Quebec. Maybe its California. Thats why a good radio scanner is important, to hear where to load up and go. Stay put in your fortress for a few months, until the panic subsides and the Zs and other survivors have battled it to the end. Then there will be less threats and more supplies, and things are finally getting stable. Do you find this valuable? |
|
Hell_Razor |
RE: Canada
May 15 2008, 8:34 PM EDT My personal survival plan isn't based on any novel or movie. I'm hunkering down where ever I'm at and waiting for the mass migration of panicked people to move away. The concepts I'm drawing from World War Z is that sound bytes and pundits will all scream "go north", without providing any practical survival knowledge. The Canadian wilderness will be the biggest and most obvious choice for most people trying to escape a Z plague. The only problem with fleeing to this area would be the millions of other people with the same idea. And I imagine people from Mexico would try as well. Maybe not, I can only speculate. Do you find this valuable? |
|
Sandbagger |
RE: Canada
May 15 2008, 10:13 PM EDT If given a choice, I would go to either Kingston, Ont. right across the St.Lawrence from Watertown ( Ft. Drum)NY, or Prince Rupert B.C., lovely coastal town. Any other suggestions? Do you find this valuable? |
