Sign in or 
Location: Zombie Media
Discussion: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
Category:
Discussion Forum /
General Discussion
Share this
Vivalamacster |
20. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
Mar 31 2009, 8:23 AM EDT
If you watch the extra features for 28 Weeks later (Im in the UK so it may not have the same as US) they tell that they wanted to make it so the infected had two sides. One side that was infected that wanted to spread the infection and another that showed just a little bit of the person left inside them. Their example was the Dad in 28 Weeks later. He was always trying to re-unite with his kids, but he was still trying to kill him. All in all, I dont really thing they class as Zombies. Maybe we should have two classes. Infected and Zombies. Zombies being actually dead flesh with a virus or such controlling them. And infected being a person who is infected with a virus but may still be alive. I think 28 Weeks later are Infected not zo0mbies. Do you find this valuable? |
|
itrytosurvive |
21. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
Apr 16 2009, 10:23 PM EDT
nope. those things are called Infected, and you can think of them as highly aggressive and primal (and infectious) humans, rather than zombies.
Do you find this valuable?
|
3DayAsylum |
22. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
Apr 16 2009, 10:36 PM EDT
Well, my mindset is that they are, indeed, 'rage' zombies.MLEPHGAPHMAT. Do you find this valuable? |
livingdeadman |
23. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
Apr 16 2009, 11:44 PM EDT
| Post edited: Apr 16 2009, 11:45 PM EDT
Put three people in a room and ask them what a zombie is and you will get three different answers. So how many kinds are there? Those that can run. Those that can't. Those that can talk. Those that can't. Those that eat you. Those that only want to kill you. Those that can smell you five miles away but can't breath. Those that can see in the dark. Those that don't see well at all. Just assume that there are many kinds of zombies and you will sleep better at night. Do not attempt to apply too much logic to zombies, it will drive you crazy. . Do you find this valuable? |
inu-dude25 |
24. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
Apr 17 2009, 8:19 AM EDT
Yeah, also there are zombies that need food and still rely on their organs (Rage Zombies) and those that don't need anything to sustain them (Resident Evil Zombies).
Do you find this valuable?
|
steveo_justice |
25. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
Apr 17 2009, 2:06 PM EDT
"Put three people in a room and ask them what a zombie is and you will get three different answers.That doesn't change the fact that all zombie lore is based on zombies being dead. If something is not biologically dead, then we can't call it a zombie, or you may as well be a zombie by some definintion. By the way, your mom was a zombie. Last Night. I could tell by the moaning. 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
CodemaneP.H.I.L. |
26. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
Apr 17 2009, 2:08 PM EDT
the whole topic can't be classified as Zombies or Infected because Zombies ARE the infected and basically they arepeople who have a unstable hunger for flesh and have there intelligence loweredWhen I heard that Solanum was also a plant, I thought that maybe Max talked about a new species of Solanum that is a carrier or producer of the Solanum Virus Do you find this valuable? |
|
livingdeadman |
27. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
Apr 17 2009, 4:08 PM EDT
"That doesn't change the fact that all zombie lore is based on zombies being dead. If something is not biologically dead, then we can't call it a zombie, or you may as well be a zombie by some definintion.Thank you for showing your true mental age. I'll be sure and ask my 82 year old mother if she had a good time last night. If you are still capable of carrying on a real conversation then what I was saying is that I too have my own ideas, (like everyone else), as to what a zombie really is. My opinions clash often with others but I have learned to be more flexible since what we are talking about doesn't even exist. Refusing to be flexible only results in anger and frustration. Asking the site owner to restrict what is and what is not a zombie will only result in many of the members leaving since many people's opinion would clash with yours. Be flexible or you won't enjoy the site much. 2 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
Archegos |
28. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
Apr 17 2009, 5:35 PM EDT
No offense to anyone who loved the film, but 28 Days later and 28 weeks alter were crap movies. Period. They could have done so much with them, but they cast horrible actors and a really good story turned into "fear the soldiers, not the zombies."
Do you find this valuable?
|
AnimateBlade |
29. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
Apr 17 2009, 7:51 PM EDT
| Post edited: Apr 17 2009, 7:57 PM EDT
"No offense to anyone who loved the film, but 28 Days later and 28 weeks alter were crap movies. Period. They could have done so much with them, but they cast horrible actors and a really good story turned into "fear the soldiers, not the zombies.""I disagree. It's a good lesson that if you trust people with guns in a world with no law then you will die, or worse. I didn't mind the acting. One could point out worse examples. Edit: Oh yeah, in answer to the question - probably not, but I like to look at them as the 'rage zombie'. They are more like a supercharged rabid human than a zombie. Do you find this valuable? |
Shawnzx |
30. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
Apr 17 2009, 10:07 PM EDT
"Thank you for showing your true mental age. I'll be sure and ask my 82 year old mother if she had a good time last night.I Agree. My version of a zombie is basically a rager that does'nt require much food, so dies in 1 year, not 28 days. lots of people make the jokes deadman, don't feel sorry. zombie free world says what a zombie is. that's why they are dead now Do you find this valuable? |
Chalaka |
31. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
May 1 2009, 10:07 PM EDT
| Post edited: May 2 2009, 5:04 PM EDT
My attention span isn't all that great on big words...but I understand what we are all talking about. My kind of zombie would be somewhere between Dawn of the Dead and Resident evil type- can still function like humans(opens doors, work as a team, problem solving, etc.) like in Dawn of the Dead, but still slow moving and not much intelligence like in Resident Evil
Do you find this valuable?
|
karaz |
32. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
May 5 2009, 11:56 PM EDT
not in the sence of living dead more of the reallllllllly mad people with mega roid rage
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
indiesandy |
33. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
May 20 2009, 4:31 PM EDT
I feel like it would be more likely to have a problem with "rage" type zombies than the living dead. With medical advances and all that, it just seems like a more realistic way for zombies to become a serious issue.
Do you find this valuable?
|
necroslaughter |
34. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
May 20 2009, 4:52 PM EDT
"for all intensive purposes, let's just classify them as zombies, because you can't talk them down, they can't be reasoned with, an they want to trear your limbs out"I dated her Do you find this valuable? |
|
inu-dude25 |
35. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
May 20 2009, 4:56 PM EDT
"No offense to anyone who loved the film, but 28 Days later and 28 weeks alter were crap movies. Period. They could have done so much with them, but they cast horrible actors and a really good story turned into "fear the soldiers, not the zombies.""They were good movies, maybe not perfect but no zombie movies are (wiht very few exceptions). The later part of both movies was a little strange, first the weird soldiers (which makes sense is you think about it), and the dad stalking the kids was corny and hard to believe. The rest of it was actually very realistic I thought. Do you find this valuable? |
|
necroslaughter |
36. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
May 20 2009, 5:03 PM EDT
"I feel like it would be more likely to have a problem with "rage" type zombies than the living dead. With medical advances and all that, it just seems like a more realistic way for zombies to become a serious issue."Not worried about medical advances I wonder about weapons advances. Some sort of mind-altering chemical sprayed by a predator drone over a battlefield. Let the enemy kill each other-add a potent aerosolized opiate that can be time released, such as Fentanyl like the Russians did when they “rescued” all those hostages from the theater (more than half died and all the terrorist were killed while passed out-and they considered it a success-half the hostages dead ha). Once the opiate kicks in go in and mop up. Do you find this valuable? |
|
inu-dude25 |
37. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
May 20 2009, 5:07 PM EDT
That's a handy bargaining tool."Give us what we want or we'll kill a hostage!" "Too late, we already gassed them." Do you find this valuable? |
|
zombehs |
38. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
May 20 2009, 5:57 PM EDT
rofls
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
necroslaughter |
39. RE: Are there actually any zombies in 28 days/weeks later?
May 21 2009, 1:32 PM EDT
The Russians are like the last group you want coming to your rescue. They are OK with it if 75% of the hostages die. The best was that they pumped so much Fentanyl into the room that 100s of people OD'd-so that means everyone passed out first ,yet the Russians still felt the need to shoot the passed out terrorists. We worry about Gitmo in Russia they shoot bad guys in drug stupors. At least they died happy, very happy. Fentanyl is like God's gift to the world of drugs.
Do you find this valuable?
|
