Location: Centers of Death and Anarchy

Discussion: I disagree on several locations.Reported This is a featured thread

Category: Discussion Forum / General Discussion
Showing 1 - 20 of 38  |  Show  posts at a time
1 2 | Next
byates
byates
I disagree on several locations.
Jan 11 2009, 5:17 PM EST | Post edited: Jan 11 2009, 5:17 PM EST
1. Iceland - Half the island is ice covered year round, bad for Zack. The government lets prison inmates out to go hunting, large number of people that have and know how to use weapons, bad for Zack.

10. Southeast U.S. - Lot of people have guns and stockpiles of everything, tight knit communities, these people are not going anywhere. Hurricanes and floods have been a fact of life since before the white man, people rebuild and get on with their life. 3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: None
richboy33lb
richboy33lb
1. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Jan 12 2009, 5:59 PM EST | Post edited: Jan 12 2009, 5:59 PM EST
Iceland is southeast of Greenland, extremely small compared to Greenalnd, This country has the smallest army in the world, which is about 200 people. If prisoners are allowed out, I would expect a huge riot.

If Z-Day occurs, FEMA and the National Guard will have bigger duties than helping survivors of a hurricane. 0  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
richboy33lb
richboy33lb
2. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Jan 14 2009, 7:20 PM EST | Post edited: Jan 14 2009, 7:20 PM EST
The Southeast U.S. will be extremely dangerous. Hurricanes of double or even triple current averages will strike very often, destroying most Southeast cities. 0  out of 5 found this valuable. Do you?    

The_Chef
3. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Jan 14 2009, 7:25 PM EST | Post edited: Jan 14 2009, 7:25 PM EST
"The Southeast U.S. will be extremely dangerous. Hurricanes of double or even triple current averages will strike very often, destroying most Southeast cities."
And why would that be?
What sceintifc backing do you have for this statement?
I'm honestly curious. 2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
byates
byates
4. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Jan 14 2009, 9:15 PM EST | Post edited: Jan 14 2009, 9:15 PM EST
"Iceland is southeast of Greenland, extremely small compared to Greenalnd, This country has the smallest army in the world, which is about 200 people. If prisoners are allowed out, I would expect a huge riot.

If Z-Day occurs, FEMA and the National Guard will have bigger duties than helping survivors of a hurricane."
http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2003/27842.htm
No army in Iceland

FEMA will know that Z-Day is happening? 2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
byates
byates
5. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Jan 14 2009, 9:19 PM EST | Post edited: Jan 14 2009, 9:19 PM EST
"The Southeast U.S. will be extremely dangerous. Hurricanes of double or even triple current averages will strike very often, destroying most Southeast cities."
I have heard that, the same people also believe that the government is covering up massive hurricane damage in Florida, the Gulf, and the Eastern Seaboard. Tell us how Charleston has been destroyed by a hurricane and the government and media are just covering it up. 2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
richboy33lb
richboy33lb
6. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Jan 15 2009, 5:24 AM EST | Post edited: Jan 15 2009, 5:24 AM EST
The hurricanes will get stronger because of the enviorment changing. There WILL be hurricanes and possibly tsunamis. No government branch is going to leave the new government HQ to go inspect Florida. 0  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
byates
byates
7. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Jan 15 2009, 10:29 AM EST | Post edited: Jan 15 2009, 10:29 AM EST
"The hurricanes will get stronger because of the enviorment changing. There WILL be hurricanes and possibly tsunamis. No government branch is going to leave the new government HQ to go inspect Florida. "
And the reason that hurricanes have been decreasing in number and strength the last couple of years is?

Of course if you are a disciple of the Prophet Gore and believe that facts only get in the way of faith, no need to respond. If you do respond please use factual evidence, not opinions. 2  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
richboy33lb
richboy33lb
8. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Jan 15 2009, 8:06 PM EST | Post edited: Jan 15 2009, 8:06 PM EST
The hurricanes will get stronger, much stronger. At that rate the world is going with the global warming, hurricanes are becoming stronger and more common by the year. With a zombie war, hundreds, if not thousands, of tons of carbon dioxide and monoxide will enter the atmosphere, therefore adding tons more global warming and causing many more, stronger hurricanes, and possibly even tsunamis. 0  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
KalZion
KalZion
9. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Jan 15 2009, 8:52 PM EST | Post edited: Jan 15 2009, 8:52 PM EST
"Tokyo- The most populated city on Earth, I guarantee not only thousands, if not millions of Zack, but also a place that will be looted for all of its advanced technology."

This statement is wrong. The most populated city is actually Mumbai. Tokyo ranks as number 11. 2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
byates
byates
10. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Jan 16 2009, 12:13 AM EST | Post edited: Jan 16 2009, 12:13 AM EST
"The hurricanes will get stronger, much stronger. At that rate the world is going with the global warming, hurricanes are becoming stronger and more common by the year. With a zombie war, hundreds, if not thousands, of tons of carbon dioxide and monoxide will enter the atmosphere, therefore adding tons more global warming and causing many more, stronger hurricanes, and possibly even tsunamis."
Wow, global warming is going to cause earthquakes, which will cause tsunamis. You seem to have overlooked the fact that the climate is cooling for the past 10 years and hurricanes are getting fewer and weaker. 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
SuperSoldierRCP
SuperSoldierRCP
11. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Jan 16 2009, 12:24 AM EST | Post edited: Jan 16 2009, 12:24 AM EST
hurricanes gain there strenght by the amount of water then can gather with the poles melting reducing the amount of salt to water ratio is believed to cuase stronger storms.more water stronger storms. sure there is also less storms only becuase theres a big on already brewing 1  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
byates
byates
12. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Jan 16 2009, 8:04 AM EST | Post edited: Jan 16 2009, 8:04 AM EST
Ice pack is increasing and storm strength is decreasing. Do you find this valuable?    
richboy33lb
richboy33lb
13. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Feb 17 2009, 8:03 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 17 2009, 8:03 PM EST
Sorry about the Tokyo thing. I had checked in a 2007 or 2006 book about it. Still, there would be tons of people flooding out of Tokyo, with many people commiting suicide (a la WWZ) Do you find this valuable?    
richboy33lb
richboy33lb
14. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Feb 17 2009, 8:07 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 17 2009, 8:07 PM EST
Byates, in the year 2007, more hurricanes occured than ever before, and this included atrina. While it shouldn't have been as bad as it was, too many people stayed, thinking it would be nothing. Do you find this valuable?    
byates
byates
15. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Feb 18 2009, 11:25 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 11:25 PM EST
"Byates, in the year 2007, more hurricanes occured than ever before, and this included atrina. While it shouldn't have been as bad as it was, too many people stayed, thinking it would be nothing."
Check the record
http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/07/no-detectable-h.html
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/downward/index.html Do you find this valuable?    
Kevin_R
Kevin_R
16. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Feb 20 2009, 3:13 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 20 2009, 3:13 PM EST
I love how this topic degenerated into an argument on climate change. What was it being discussed before this thread got sidetracked? 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

zombehs
17. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Feb 21 2009, 2:23 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 21 2009, 2:23 PM EST
"Check the record
http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/07/no-detectable-h.html
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/downward/index.html"
actually byates right now we're in sort of a period of time where tropical storms are decreasing in strength but the power of storms will steadily increase in the next decade or so. Its just an on and off cycle. Do you find this valuable?    

zombehs
18. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Feb 21 2009, 2:27 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 21 2009, 2:27 PM EST
GO TO SWITZERLAND!!! Do you find this valuable?    
Noobzy
Noobzy
19. RE: I disagree on several locations.
Feb 21 2009, 2:44 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 21 2009, 2:44 PM EST
"The hurricanes will get stronger, much stronger. At that rate the world is going with the global warming, hurricanes are becoming stronger and more common by the year. With a zombie war, hundreds, if not thousands, of tons of carbon dioxide and monoxide will enter the atmosphere, therefore adding tons more global warming and causing many more, stronger hurricanes, and possibly even tsunamis."
global warming is a scam because the cause is not carbon dioxide and moxide but by the sunspots and solar flares. the reason its a scam is because its all made up cant you see that Al Gore is making a ton of money because he owns the global warming facade. if you want to state facts look them up. Do you find this valuable?    
1 2 | Next