Location: How The Infection Will Unfold

Discussion: On credibilityReported This is a featured thread

Showing 3 posts

PatientZeroSurvivor
On credibility
Oct 29 2009, 12:42 PM EDT | Post edited: Oct 29 2009, 12:42 PM EDT
This article isn't concerned with the believability of any virus. It assumes that a particular virus IS true, and HAS happened, and then describes the course of events that follow, using as much logic as possible and in other places giving reasons why.
Everyone has their own opinions about how realistic the scenarios are, but that's discussed in another article! ;)
Do you find this valuable?    
PedroAsani
PedroAsani
1. RE: On credibility
Oct 29 2009, 7:58 PM EDT | Post edited: Oct 29 2009, 7:58 PM EDT
Could the article be more concerned with it's formatting? All bold AND underlined? Difficult to read. And if the eyes are bleeding, nobody's reading. Do you find this valuable?    
spamanninen
spamanninen
2. RE: On credibility
Oct 29 2009, 8:05 PM EDT | Post edited: Oct 29 2009, 8:05 PM EDT
"This article isn't concerned with the believability of any virus. It assumes that a particular virus IS true, and HAS happened, and then describes the course of events that follow, using as much logic as possible and in other places giving reasons why.
Everyone has their own opinions about how realistic the scenarios are, but that's discussed in another article! ;)"
Well with a screen name like PatientZeroSurvivor, who am I to argue with you?
Do you find this valuable?    

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)