Location: Community Topics

Discussion: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humansReported This is a featured thread

Category: Discussion Forum / Necro-Biology
Showing 1 - 20 of 73  |  Show  posts at a time
1 2 3 4 | Next
trophykiller
trophykiller
zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 6:43 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 6:43 AM EDT
in all the zombie movies, books, ect. out there, only a relatively small portion have the animals get infected, but an even smaller portion pays attention to them at all beyond a couple dogs.

however, i get the feeling(and when i get these types of feelings, they're always right and have even saved my life a few times) that when the z-virus hits, all creatures in the mammal family will be vulnerable(for those of you who are like "not a big deal", learn what kind of animals are in the mammal family, then go check your pants because you probably just crapped yourself.)

zombie dogs and wolves have an acute sence of smell that they can track you down with, zombie rodents can easily infiltrate regular defences, zombie bats... fly and will be a pain in the @ss, zombie dolphins and whales will spread it to all four corners of the earth, and then*gulp* dare i say it... zombie bears!(self explanitory)

as you can tell, zombie humans, while still very dangerous, will be only a small problem compared to the animals. also, i know alot of you are wondering how the z-virus will go international, but after reading this, you should ask yourself how it couldn't. 2  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    

jjthomas3
1. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 7:19 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 7:19 AM EDT
O_O

We are screwed. Do you find this valuable?    
trophykiller
trophykiller
2. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 10:16 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 10:16 AM EDT
most of us are. i hope this leads to more threads on how to combat zanimals(new nick-name) Do you find this valuable?    

jjthomas3
3. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 10:19 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 10:27 AM EDT
"zanimals"
That sounds like some kind of cookie.

You could use the rats to teach people how to shoot with minimal danger. It could be a good first duty for the younger survivors. Just give them a .22 and have an older person nearby to shoot any that get within a certain distance (can't let anyone get infected). Do you find this valuable?    
trophykiller
trophykiller
4. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 11:01 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 11:01 AM EDT
not even a .22, you could use a bb gun and still be able to kill them yet not waste valuble ammo. and people said kids will be a liability.

anyway, i would like to point out that i disbelieve in shamblers, instead these animals will be ragers. and yes, that means rager bears. 1  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    

jjthomas3
5. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 11:07 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 11:07 AM EDT
Rager bears... I would like to repeat my O_O

You may be right about the bb guns, though you would want stronger ones just to be sure. No point getting someone infected if you can avoid it. Do you find this valuable?    
anninhilator
anninhilator
6. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 11:25 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 11:25 AM EDT
ok ever wondered why rabies didnt infect all animals?
kuz other animals run from infected animals and can defend themselves and can detect an infected animal
also rabies doesnt work so good on humans, which COULD mean that z virus does not work on that way on animals 1  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    

jjthomas3
7. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 11:29 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 11:29 AM EDT
"ok ever wondered why rabies didnt infect all animals?
kuz other animals run from infected animals and can defend themselves and can detect an infected animal
also rabies doesnt work so good on humans, which COULD mean that z virus does not work on that way on animals"
There is always the chance of them getting bitten when they can't run (cornered, exhausted, etc.) and becoming infected.

Seeing your post reminds me that I need an avatar. Do you find this valuable?    
anninhilator
anninhilator
8. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 11:35 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 11:35 AM EDT
yes so thats the reason why rabies isnt viped out
but still most of the fauna manages to escape\defend Do you find this valuable?    
trophykiller
trophykiller
9. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 11:36 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 11:36 AM EDT
"ok ever wondered why rabies didnt infect all animals?
kuz other animals run from infected animals and can defend themselves and can detect an infected animal
also rabies doesnt work so good on humans, which COULD mean that z virus does not work on that way on animals"
when did i mention raibies? also, ever wonder why rabies hasn't led to the fall of civilization? perhaps we could be dealing with a bioweapon or something.

also, about the bioweapon thing, wouldn't it be the most devastating weapon ever? Do you find this valuable?    
anninhilator
anninhilator
10. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 11:45 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 11:45 AM EDT
rabies is zombism
just not human zombism

and no biowep wouldnt be teh most devestating thing
not to mention noone would make\release such a wep Do you find this valuable?    

jjthomas3
11. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 11:45 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 11:45 AM EDT
"yes so thats the reason why rabies isnt viped out
but still most of the fauna manages to escape\defend"
Another thing, what if an infected animal (before becoming a zombie) attacks another animal? Do you find this valuable?    
anninhilator
anninhilator
12. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 11:55 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 11:55 AM EDT
animals dont fight
if one is hurt, it gets killed and eaten
will it become infected, idkXD Do you find this valuable?    
trophykiller
trophykiller
13. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 12:01 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 12:04 PM EDT
alright, i think i was able to decipher your horribly mutilated spelling and grammar, and yes, it would be the most devastating weapon ever(it kills PLANETS, for pete sake) and look at the other weapons people have made and used: some people are full of hate and malice. end of conversation, i'd like this not to turn into a flame war.

P.S. ever heard the quote from Einstein after the nukes were set off "i dont know what weopons world war 3 will be fought with, but i know world war 4 will be fought with sticks and stones." the z-weapon is the true embodiment of that statement. Do you find this valuable?    

jjthomas3
14. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 12:15 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 12:15 PM EDT
"animals dont fight
if one is hurt, it gets killed and eaten
will it become infected, idkXD"
1. O_O really? Animals don't fight? I am not even going to try to fight you on that one.

2. Exactly, if it is hurt and infected, other animals will eat it infecting themselves.

3. No one knows, that is why we prepare for the worst and hope for the best. Do you find this valuable?    
anninhilator
anninhilator
15. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 12:16 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 12:16 PM EDT
i mean dont fair fight
they hunt but dont fight fair
actually they do but very rare
 Do you find this valuable?    
anninhilator
anninhilator
16. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 12:17 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 12:17 PM EDT
"
3. No one knows, that is why we prepare for the worst and hope for the best."
not necessary
and as said rabies arent so dangerous kuz if they are, every animal will be infected Do you find this valuable?    

jjthomas3
17. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 12:20 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 12:20 PM EDT
"i mean dont fair fight
they hunt but dont fight fair
actually they do but very rare
"
1. Have you ever seen wolves fight? How about cats? Or dogs, bears, snakes, etc.

2. quite necessary.

3. please don't double post and please learn grammar. Do you find this valuable?    
Duton1
Duton1
18. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 12:24 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 12:24 PM EDT
Think of this however, If an animal were to become infected and IF it became a zombie, it would be far away in the wilderness, where most of the animals will retreat to once the cities become overrun.

In addition, if an animal were to become infected, I highly doubt that the other animals of the group would allow it, they'd kill them off.

Also, in some cases zombified animals isn't a bad thing, because take a look, Bears are already ten times more powerful then humans, which leads to the conclusion that other then becoming smarter there is no real way for them to be any more dangerous (If they were ragers) If they aren't ragers they're classic G.A.R. zombies in which case they're dumber then before, and slower, making them easy prey (Not for eating though) for anyone with their weapons in sights. Do you find this valuable?    

jjthomas3
19. RE: zombie animals 10x greater threat than humans
Aug 27 2010, 12:30 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 27 2010, 12:30 PM EDT
"Think of this however, If an animal were to become infected and IF it became a zombie, it would be far away in the wilderness, where most of the animals will retreat to once the cities become overrun.

In addition, if an animal were to become infected, I highly doubt that the other animals of the group would allow it, they'd kill them off.

Also, in some cases zombified animals isn't a bad thing, because take a look, Bears are already ten times more powerful then humans, which leads to the conclusion that other then becoming smarter there is no real way for them to be any more dangerous (If they were ragers) If they aren't ragers they're classic G.A.R. zombies in which case they're dumber then before, and slower, making them easy prey (Not for eating though) for anyone with their weapons in sights."
Problem with the "kill them off" part:
When the infected animal is attacked is it going to let itself die? It would fight back and infect the other animals.

And if we are preparing for zombies, we might as well prepare for "zanimals" using trophykiller's term. Do you find this valuable?    
1 2 3 4 | Next

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)
ZSDW Minecraft Multiplayer Sign Up Thread! Attack Dogs or Other Animals Building a Colony
GPS a good thing or not? Major ZSDW Community Project Starting November 4 Wheel Jive
Prominent Features ZSDW Christmas Secret Santa! Who here is on xbox
Dummy Grenades? Practical use for the BOB Proffesional Badass.