Sign in or 

|
TurnAndBurn |
40. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 19 2011, 2:07 PM EDT
I should think not. It would just seem that they leave the improvised business to the cloak and dagger alphabet soup named agencies (FBI CIA DIA) and would just give premade charges to their men who are heading into an area with a clearly defined objective.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
chitoryu12 |
41. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 19 2011, 5:48 PM EDT
"I should think not. It would just seem that they leave the improvised business to the cloak and dagger alphabet soup named agencies (FBI CIA DIA) and would just give premade charges to their men who are heading into an area with a clearly defined objective."It's still good for them to have a practical knowledge of their craft; you don't send your drivers out into the field if they couldn't tell a spark plug from a carburetor, would you? That's not suggesting that the demo men are mixing up their own bombs before a mission or that they'll be sent in with orders to make a bomb from locally bought fertilizer and cleaning products, but they would probably know how as part of their training. 2 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
JamesIkanov |
42. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 19 2011, 10:54 PM EDT
"I learned from a few SF members how to make them. I was taught to respect them and have alot of safety materials around like vinegar to neutralize acids,fire exstinguishers, gas masks etc. Alot of it is rather simple to do but for anyone who just decides to try it. I'd advise against it. Read up on it if your interested but if you dont have someone to hold your hand you may end up losing it."thanks for not just shooting me down for doing this stuff. and actually, i have read up. I still have some more sh!t i ought to finish reading, like those pages that warn you about chemical incompatibilities(not as bad as it sounds. if you avoid mixing unknown chemicals or chemicals with unknown effects your totally safe.) 2 out of 4 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
JamesIkanov |
43. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 19 2011, 11:01 PM EDT
| Post edited: Jul 22 2011, 1:09 AM EDT
"You weren't taught nearly enough. Particularly about vinegar.WRONG! you don't need specialized training , even though you it's probably for the best if you do get it at some point. all you really need is common sense and a fairly decent knowledge of chemistry. as long as you don't mix chemicals at random, and store them properly, you're fine. and unless you have at least hmm, a few ounces of flash powder, improperly stored, in an outer room of a house, there's not much risk. And it won't truly explode unless confined. IE, you'd basically have to TRY to get yourself blown up. unless of course you're screwing with death-mixes. but that's a whole nother story. Edit: for anyone wondering, death mixes are the stupidest thing you could possibly do involving explosives/pyrotechnics. these are mixes so unstable that they can ignite themselves, and on top of this, they are usually incredibly powerful. 1 out of 4 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
JamesIkanov |
44. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 19 2011, 11:11 PM EDT
| Post edited: Jul 19 2011, 11:14 PM EDT
All right look, I'm sick of this cr@p. The point of this thread was to point people interested in explosives for post z-day use in the right direction, and steer them clear of idiots like those in the anarchist cookbook. instead, this spiraled into an argument about why anyone who touches explosives without years of training is a complete F#cking moron. which is still total ********. this wasn't supposed to condemn explosives, but rather warn people about the dangers of having no Fvcking clue what there doing, and the risks that are entailed with that. So please, STFU and get back to the point of this thread, of GTFO.
1
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
Sharpie41 |
45. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 20 2011, 12:02 AM EDT
"All right look, I'm sick of this cr@p. The point of this thread was to point people interested in explosives for post z-day use in the right direction, and steer them clear of idiots like those in the anarchist cookbook. instead, this spiraled into an argument about why anyone who touches explosives without years of training is a complete F#cking moron. which is still total ********. this wasn't supposed to condemn explosives, but rather warn people about the dangers of having no Fvcking clue what there doing, and the risks that are entailed with that. So please, STFU and get back to the point of this thread, of GTFO."Dude calm down, threads get side-tracked, deal with it or (in your words) GTFO 2 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
JamesIkanov |
46. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 20 2011, 12:12 AM EDT
I am calm. I was just hoping to get the thread back on track.Do you find this valuable? |
|
brandon_a_boyer |
47. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 20 2011, 3:17 AM EDT
I'm sorry man, but most of the stuff you've said leads me to believe either you are a teen-aged amateur pyro who is just smart enough to be a danger to himself and others.
0
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
JamesIkanov |
48. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 20 2011, 12:04 PM EDT
| Post edited: Jul 20 2011, 1:19 PM EDT
"I'm sorry man, but most of the stuff you've said leads me to believe either you are a teen-aged amateur pyro who is just smart enough to be a danger to himself and others."Yup, I'm a teenager. Still an amateur. a danger to my self? only if my house was set on fire. metal fuels burn pretty hot. a danger to others? not likely. the only possible thing i could see happening to injure somebody else is lighting one of my fireworks and having somebody not notice me waving them down, and drive their car over it, as it was going off. Can you see how unlikely that is? seriously. just because you are interested in pyrotechnics doesn't automatically make you dangerous. Edit: just to be clear, what i was talking about when i mentioned cars driving over one of my fireworks, was that i usually test my handiwork on a nearly deserted stretch of road by my house. i use it BECAUSE THERE ARE NO BUILDINGS FOR 200+ FEET. does that sound irresponsible? Do you find this valuable? |
|
PedroAsani |
49. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 20 2011, 3:01 PM EDT
"WRONG! you don't need specialized training , even though you it's probably for the best if you do get it at some point. all you really need is common sense and a fairly decent knowledge of chemistry. as long as you don't mix chemicals at random, and store them properly, you're fine. and unless you have at least hmm, a few ounces of flash powder, improperly stored, in an outer room of a house, there's not much risk. And it won't truly explode unless confined. IE, you'd basically have to TRY to get yourself blown up. unless of course you're screwing with death-mixes. but that's a whole nother story."See, it's you who is wrong. A properly made and stored firework can still explode at the wrong time. Stored chemicals can still spill, containers can leak and break. Explosives are by nature unstable compounds. Every year more than 10,000 people in the US are injured by supposedly "safe" explosives. Seventy percent of these people are under 24. Your lack of experience is a factor. Your lack of training is a factor. Your teenage hubris is a factor. You can say that you take care doing this, but the fact remains you are storing explosive materials in a residential dwelling, have no proper training and set off these explosions in a public (either residential or commercial) area. Travelling out to a desolate area doesn't give you carte blanche to do what you want. Have you thought about the possibility of causing a wildfire? What is your definition of "store them properly"? 2 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
PedroAsani |
50. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 20 2011, 3:02 PM EDT
"All right look, I'm sick of this cr@p. The point of this thread was to point people interested in explosives for post z-day use in the right direction, and steer them clear of idiots like those in the anarchist cookbook. instead, this spiraled into an argument about why anyone who touches explosives without years of training is a complete F#cking moron. which is still total ********. this wasn't supposed to condemn explosives, but rather warn people about the dangers of having no Fvcking clue what there doing, and the risks that are entailed with that. So please, STFU and get back to the point of this thread, of GTFO."Throw a hissy fit like this and you are asking for a ban. You also show that you are not the kind of person whom I would want to be handling explosive material. 3 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
PedroAsani |
51. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 20 2011, 3:13 PM EDT
Final post on this. The risk is not just physical injury:SOME EXPLOSIVES LAWS IN CALIFORNIA 1. A misdemeanor is punishable by up to a year of confinement in the county jail. A felony is punishable by a year or more in the State Prison. You can no longer be in possession of firearms, hold public office or vote if you are convicted of a felony. 2. A person who is convicted of an offense involving an explosive device is not eligible for probation. The judge must sentence him to serve time in jail. 3. An M-80 can be considered to be an explosive device and possession of an M-80 can be a felony. 4. It is a felony to possess or explode a container by the use of expanding gas (example: vinegar and baking soda or a CO2 device) {a simple rule of thumb is that if it explodes, it is probably illegal} 5. It is a felony to possess or explode any explosive device. (M-80s, or any explosive device that can cause serious injury or property damage) 6. It is a felony to possess the components of an explosive device (container, explosive filler, means of initiating and exploding) So, by doing what you are doing in California, you are risking prison, a criminal record and losing the ability to own guns or vote. Other states might vary, but I'm guessing they won't do so by very much. Do you find this valuable? |
|
TurnAndBurn |
52. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 20 2011, 7:07 PM EDT
Another great reason to avoid this kind of discussion, particularly methods would be to keep this site open. All survivalist sites are likely monitored for just this type of material which while legal to discuss strictly for educational reasons once taken out of context becomes intent, aiding or abetting a crime. Not to mention a likely charge for conspiracy. If you know what you are doing then good for you but I would refrain from "enlightening" anyone else particularly through open forums on the internet.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
PedroAsani |
53. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 20 2011, 7:22 PM EDT
"Another great reason to avoid this kind of discussion, particularly methods would be to keep this site open. All survivalist sites are likely monitored for just this type of material which while legal to discuss strictly for educational reasons once taken out of context becomes intent, aiding or abetting a crime. Not to mention a likely charge for conspiracy. If you know what you are doing then good for you but I would refrain from "enlightening" anyone else particularly through open forums on the internet."No government TLA will shut down a zombie website. They would be ridiculed by the press and the other TLAs. 2 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
TurnAndBurn |
54. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 21 2011, 2:58 PM EDT
Perhaps so, but at the same time there has been a lot of sites being taken offline because they shared a server with another site that is under investigation. Perhaps paranoid I will admit but I still don't think it's a good idea to discuss such topics on open forum.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
PedroAsani |
55. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 21 2011, 4:43 PM EDT
"Perhaps so, but at the same time there has been a lot of sites being taken offline because they shared a server with another site that is under investigation. Perhaps paranoid I will admit but I still don't think it's a good idea to discuss such topics on open forum."Discussion of them is legal. Advocation of their use in any illegal fashion is not. Discussion of their use in a post-apocalyptic fashion is legal. It is a theoretical framework and nobody with any sense would take anything said within to be used in the world today. 3 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
JamesIkanov |
56. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 21 2011, 10:02 PM EDT
| Post edited: Jul 21 2011, 10:29 PM EDT
"See, it's you who is wrong.My definition of store them properly? keep every chemical sealed in the container they came in (airtight), mix in no more than one ounce at a time, and use IMMEDIATELY after doing so. I keep all my chems in a lock box that i don't even have the key to. i leave that with my parents, who are in charge of all my experiments. Technically(and realistically) I'm not even storing explosives. they are again kept apart by components, or ingredients. it's like having all the ingredients for a recipe, but not mixing them. it's completely safe and even if by some miracle, they managed to mix, there's nothing to set them off. and again, if by some miracle(and I assure you, we're already past the 1 in a few million mark.) they mixed and were ignited, i seriously doubt that it would kill or even seriously injure anyone. By the way, I have to ask. WTF does hubris mean? EDIT: Crap! i had more i wanted to say, but, Char limit reached. 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
JamesIkanov |
57. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 21 2011, 10:12 PM EDT
"Final post on this. The risk is not just physical injury:But, I'm not in California. and as you may or may not know, California tends to be very strict. and on the legal side of things: A) this would be my first criminal offense in any way. B) Again, the largest thing I have ever detonated was not even an M80. C) I have not done anything on that list., nor have i done anything remotely criminal involving explosives or conflagrants. D) The odds of me even being questioned by the police for anything are next to nil. E) I'm going to assume all that is the law for adults? I'm under 18. Do you find this valuable? |
|
VagabondVance |
58. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 21 2011, 10:12 PM EDT
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=hubris+
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
OutlawJames |
59. RE: Explosives are risky.
Jul 21 2011, 10:15 PM EDT
"It means extreme pride or arrogance. Do you find this valuable? |