Location: null

Discussion: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)Reported This is a featured thread This thread was locked for the following reason: (none given).

Showing 41 - 60 of 1630  |  Show  posts at a time
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last
DEVILDOGMP
DEVILDOGMP
40. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 5:01 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 5:01 PM EDT
Why is everyone so convinced that military bases will be overran? Have any of you seen Camp Pendleton, 29 Palms, Ft. Irwin, etc? These are very very large bases with units widely spread, with a lot more protection than many would think. This is just an impossibility to me. 6  out of 8 found this valuable. Do you?    
BlueFalconFlying
BlueFalconFlying
41. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 5:18 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 5:18 PM EDT
"Why is everyone so convinced that military bases will be overran? Have any of you seen Camp Pendleton, 29 Palms, Ft. Irwin, etc? These are very very large bases with units widely spread, with a lot more protection than many would think. This is just an impossibility to me."
infection will spread from the inside.
2  out of 7 found this valuable. Do you?    
DEVILDOGMP
DEVILDOGMP
42. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 5:20 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 5:20 PM EDT
"infection will spread from the inside."
How does it get inside? We inspect all drivers and vehicles comming in and out of the base.
6  out of 8 found this valuable. Do you?    
Carnack
Carnack
43. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 5:23 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 5:28 PM EDT
Those bases would need resupply to maintain an offense. The providers (makers) of those supplies would also need protecting.
The makers of the individual materials required for those supplies would also need protecting.

One would also need to move those supplies which requires fuel for either trucks or helicopters which means the fuel producers, and takeoff sites would need to be protected. Parts for repairs, producers of said parts, and the techs to install them would also need to be present. These folks probably live local and have local family as well. Hence a conflict.

All to resupply a base. At least 2 (extreme minimum) extra locations would be required.

And I don't even know how often a base is supplied to keep its troops fed and clothed and armed.

Camp Pendleton is situated in area with quite a large population* (easy infection) which means that overun is not "impossable".

*The census is telling me a little over 3 million (supposedly current as of '09) is the populace but that rings false to me but due to it's location in Cali the population would be quite large.

29 Palms may fare better but not enough to warrant an actual fight. If they put forth an offensive. They would also require the above.

Fort Irwin is also in Cali with its associated population.
1  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
BlueFalconFlying
BlueFalconFlying
44. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 5:32 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 5:32 PM EDT
"How does it get inside? We inspect all drivers and vehicles comming in and out of the base."
how? anyone with a tag gets waved in. they could carry the infection in before it even becomes an epic problem.
1  out of 6 found this valuable. Do you?    
DEVILDOGMP
DEVILDOGMP
45. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 5:32 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 5:32 PM EDT
"Those bases would need resupply to maintain an offense. The providers (makers) of those supplies would also need protecting.
The makers of the individual materials required for those supplies would also need protecting.

One would also need to move those supplies which requires fuel for either trucks or helicopters which means the fuel producers, and takeoff sites would need to be protected. Parts for repairs, producers of said parts, and the techs to install them would also need to be present. These folks probably live local and have local family as well. Hence a conflict.

All to resupply a base. At least 2 (extreme minimum) extra locations would be required.

And I don't even know how often a base is supplied to keep its troops fed and clothed and armed.

Camp Pendleton is situated in area with quite a large population* (easy infection) which means that overun is not "impossable".

*The census is telling me a little over 3 million (supposedly current as of '09) is the populace but that rings false to me but due to it's location in Cali the population would be quite large.

29 Palms may fare better but not enough to warrant an actual fight. If they put forth an offensive. They would also require the above.

Fort Irwin is also in Cali with its associated population."
You have to remember these are military installations with food, generators, water etc, specifically for the purpose of disaster preparation and relief. The possibility of Camp Pendleton being overan is slim, but 29 palms nearly impossible.
7  out of 10 found this valuable. Do you?    
BlueFalconFlying
BlueFalconFlying
46. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 5:35 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 5:35 PM EDT
"You have to remember these are military installations with food, generators, water etc, specifically for the purpose of disaster preparation and relief. The possibility of Camp Pendleton being overan is slim, but 29 palms nearly impossible."
hahaha we used to walk right in the chritianitos side through the tomato patch drunk on some nights. easy as hell
1  out of 6 found this valuable. Do you?    
Carnack
Carnack
47. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 5:36 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 5:38 PM EDT
"You have to remember these are military installations with food, generators, water etc, specifically for the purpose of disaster preparation and relief. The possibility of Camp Pendleton being overan is slim, but 29 palms nearly impossible."
I have taken that into account. Have you accounted for the rate in which those supplies will be used?

The possibility that your base may turn into an emergency med station (with tons of people showing up for med treatment)?

There is in fact a very defined end point in which you'll be able to effectivly fight without resupply and unless you can manufacture more ammo, food, and fuel you are hosed.
1  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
BlueFalconFlying
BlueFalconFlying
48. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 5:41 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 5:41 PM EDT
"You have to remember these are military installations with food, generators, water etc, specifically for the purpose of disaster preparation and relief. The possibility of Camp Pendleton being overan is slim, but 29 palms nearly impossible."
i think i would risk being eaten alive compared to living in 29palms!
3  out of 7 found this valuable. Do you?    
DEVILDOGMP
DEVILDOGMP
49. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 5:41 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 5:41 PM EDT
"I have taken that into account. Have you accounted for the rate in which those supplies will be used?

The possibility that your base may turn into an emergency med station?

There is in fact a very defined end point in which you'll be able to effectivly fight without resupply and unless you can manufacture more you are hosed."
Really all depends on what "type" of zed we are dealing with. If they are Romero Zombies, they we have tanks, APCs, Strykers, and close air support from Miramar, with Cobra's and F18's. Then we have North Island Naval Station for some naval bombardment. Plus Marines on the ground. I mean sure you can walk in but with a huge chunk taken out of ur arm? Your a$ would be taken to sick bay or Balboa and ud probabally be quarantined. Or the hospital on Pendleton. Either way, overrunning those entire bases is clearly not possible through conventional walk ins.
4  out of 6 found this valuable. Do you?    
BlueFalconFlying
BlueFalconFlying
50. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 5:44 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 5:44 PM EDT
"Really all depends on what "type" of zed we are dealing with. If they are Romero Zombies, they we have tanks, APCs, Strykers, and close air support from Miramar, with Cobra's and F18's. Then we have North Island Naval Station for some naval bombardment. Plus Marines on the ground. I mean sure you can walk in but with a huge chunk taken out of ur arm? Your a$ would be taken to sick bay or Balboa and ud probabally be quarantined. Or the hospital on Pendleton. Either way, overrunning those entire bases is clearly not possible through conventional walk ins."
agree to disagree.
1  out of 6 found this valuable. Do you?    
Carnack
Carnack
51. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 5:50 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 5:52 PM EDT
"Really all depends on what "type" of zed we are dealing with. If they are Romero Zombies, they we have tanks, APCs, Strykers, and close air support from Miramar, with Cobra's and F18's. Then we have North Island Naval Station for some naval bombardment. Plus Marines on the ground. I mean sure you can walk in but with a huge chunk taken out of ur arm? Your a$ would be taken to sick bay or Balboa and ud probabally be quarantined. Or the hospital on Pendleton. Either way, overrunning those entire bases is clearly not possible through conventional walk ins."
Assuming Miramar is in a position to expend fuel on your situation.

Same for the Naval Station.

I notice also that you hinge these bases survival on the willingness and ability (a gamble here) of other bases to lend assistance.

If they are in a similar position your chances of aid diminish. Especially if aiding you yields no benifit.

As for conventional walk-ins I know of few people who can pick out a single wound in a chaotic mass of people.

The numbers here all point to military bases not being immune to being overrun/starved out through very possible and realistic means in this situation.
1  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
DEVILDOGMP
DEVILDOGMP
52. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 5:50 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 5:50 PM EDT
"agree to disagree."
Agreed.
2  out of 5 found this valuable. Do you?    
DevilNuts
DevilNuts
53. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 5:55 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 5:55 PM EDT
"There is in fact a very defined end point in which you'll be able to effectivly fight without resupply and unless you can manufacture more ammo, food, and fuel you are hosed."
Well aren't you a ray of fcking sunshine today? Glass half-full kind of guy? I kid, I kid.

Agreed, there are parts of some of the larger bases where you can simply walk in. Security is tight, and supplies are finite. There is one thing that we have that the zombies do not, which carried us through Korea, Vietnam, and pretty much every conflict we have been involved in since its invention, which you failed to mention...


....Motherfcking helicopters. WE WIN.
7  out of 7 found this valuable. Do you?    
DEVILDOGMP
DEVILDOGMP
54. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 5:59 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 5:59 PM EDT
"Well aren't you a ray of fcking sunshine today? Glass half-full kind of guy? I kid, I kid.

Agreed, there are parts of some of the larger bases where you can simply walk in. Security is tight, and supplies are finite. There is one thing that we have that the zombies do not, which carried us through Korea, Vietnam, and pretty much every conflict we have been involved in since its invention, which you failed to mention...


....Motherfcking helicopters. WE WIN. "
I said Cobras!
1  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
Carnack
Carnack
55. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 6:00 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 6:01 PM EDT
"Well aren't you a ray of fcking sunshine today? Glass half-full kind of guy? I kid, I kid.

Agreed, there are parts of some of the larger bases where you can simply walk in. Security is tight, and supplies are finite. There is one thing that we have that the zombies do not, which carried us through Korea, Vietnam, and pretty much every conflict we have been involved in since its invention, which you failed to mention...


....Motherfcking helicopters. WE WIN. "
Helicopters?

Okay so you need fuel, pilots, techs for refueling and repairs, and defendable liftoff points.
Or as I said before "One would also need to move those supplies which requires fuel for either trucks or helicopters which means the fuel producers, and takeoff sites would need to be protected. Parts for repairs, producers of said parts, and the techs to install them would also need to be present. These folks probably live local and have local family as well. Hence a conflict."

It still requires more than one location to be defended as well as one of those locations having a surplus of gear to give.

Not trying to argue but I'm not quite seeing the impossability here.
1  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
DevilNuts
DevilNuts
56. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 6:01 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 6:03 PM EDT
*I* never said impossible, but indeed, far from the opposite. I would much rather be on base than off, if given the option.

EDIT: We already have fuel, pilots, techs, maintenance facilities, trucks, defendable liftoff points AND the defenders to defend them. ALL of it. It's already there, ready to go. Hell, it's our purpose in life.
5  out of 5 found this valuable. Do you?    
DEVILDOGMP
DEVILDOGMP
57. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 6:04 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 6:04 PM EDT
"Helicopters?

Okay so you need fuel, pilots, techs for refueling and repairs, and defendable liftoff points.
Or as I said before "One would also need to move those supplies which requires fuel for either trucks or helicopters which means the fuel producers, and takeoff sites would need to be protected. Parts for repairs, producers of said parts, and the techs to install them would also need to be present. These folks probably live local and have local family as well. Hence a conflict."

It still requires more than one location to be defended as well as one of those locations having a surplus of gear to give.

Not trying to argue but I'm not quite seeing the impossability here."
Are you in the military? We have all of those, with various helipads and units across the base. Security is tight, I'm an MP its kinda my job to make sure it is.
1  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
Carnack
Carnack
58. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 6:04 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 6:04 PM EDT
"*I* never said impossible, but indeed, far from the opposite. I would much rather be on base than off, if given the option. "
I know you didn't.

I prefer off. Much like the police station everyone will flock to these bases bring disease and hostility with them.

I'd rather not be the object of their ire if I can help it.
2  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
Carnack
Carnack
59. RE: Military v. Zombies(The Real Odds)
Mar 30 2011, 6:05 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2011, 6:05 PM EDT
"Are you in the military? We have all of those, with various helipads and units across the base. Security is tight, I'm an MP its kinda my job to make sure it is. "
No I'm not in the military but I do have eyes and can see numbers.

And what I'm seeing is that survival of one base hinges on the survival of another.
1  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last