Sign in or 

|
White76Knight |
On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 10:53 AM EDT
To avoid derailing the hatchets thread any further than I already have, I'm starting a new thread for this question.Quoted from my post on that thread: "Splatter aside, how many people carry or plan to carry a firearm that, if their buddy was standing behind the zed, wouldn't experience over-penetration and risk hitting your buddy by mistake? While I'm not too concerned about hitting my buddy with splatter, presupposing that he's properly protected from it, I'd just as soon not accidentally shoot him." Since I believe that anything worthy of being used as a defensive caliber would risk this at least to some degree, what are your thoughts on dealing with this issue? And please lets keep the just-make-sure-you-buddy's-not-in-the-way replies to a minimum, shall we? We all recognize the importance of keeping safe lines of fire, but sometimes, in the heat of combat, this just isn't possible. And sometimes your buddy or some other survivor may be on the other side of a wall behind a zombie, and you don't even know they're there. Most common handgun calibers, and AFAIK any rifle caliber, would have no problem penetrating a single target while still having plenty of oomph left to go through a standard household wall to injure somebody on the other side. I'd think that shotguns would be less likely to experience this, but that would depend on what the shooter has them loaded with. Do you find this valuable? |
|
2WheeledSpeed |
1. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 11:15 AM EDT
| Post edited: May 18 2011, 11:17 AM EDT
The FBI has a little to say about this subject, in their study on handgun wounding factors. I'll paraphrase it a bit. The full text is here, page 12...http://www.firearmstactical.com/pdf/fbi-hwfe.pdf Any review of police shootings show that more bullets fired MISS than actually hit their targets. The few bullets that actually hit their targets, are not more dangerous to bystanders than the ones that miss entirely. Also, a bullet that passes entirely through a human body loses a lot of energy. Experiments show that the skin on the exit side of the body is equal to 4 inches of muscle tissue. No LE officer ever lost his life because his bullet overpenetrated. Though officers have lost their lives because their bullets underpenetrated. ___ My take on this? I'd rather err on the side of overpenetration. If I'm remembering my history correctly, the FBI commissioned that study partially because of a shootout where a bullet that didn't penetrate enough allowed a badguy to go on fighting for several minutes after he was shot. Do you find this valuable? |
|
White76Knight |
2. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 11:18 AM EDT
"The FBI has a little to say about this subject, in their study on handgun wounding factors. I'll paraphrase it a bit. The full text is here, page 12...Thanks for the link, I'll check it out. Do you find this valuable? |
|
2WheeledSpeed |
3. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 11:22 AM EDT
"Thanks for the link, I'll check it out."Hope the link works, it's really an interesting read overall. Do you find this valuable? |
|
White76Knight |
4. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 11:34 AM EDT
"Hope the link works, it's really an interesting read overall."I haven't read the article yet, but I know that overpenetration is a much discussed topic amongst home defense gun owners, on account of family members in the next room and what not, and I see this as the same sort of situation. So even if only for the rounds that miss the original target, who has considered overpenetration as a factor when choosing a particular gun in a particular caliber for EDC or home defense? Do you find this valuable? |
|
Abu_Fulan |
5. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 11:43 AM EDT
While I would like to use my shotgun as my primary weapon for Z-day, I KNOW I'll have my .357 with me, so I'll discuss it instead. When I have the time and money I plan to test several loads in my pistol to find two or three kinds of ammo that work well in it. Two will be .38 SPL -- a 158g LSWCHP for regular carry and a very light (think 110 grain) hollow point. The third will be a heavy magnum ball load like Buffalo Bore's 180 grain. (This idea is based off info from The Brass Fetcher.com. Found a .38 SPL load that only penetrated the gel block to less than 9 inches, contrasted with a heavy Buffalo Bore round that penetrated over 23 inches.) With these loads I should be able to adapt somewhat to the circumstances. In other words, if I was forced to clear an apartment I'd use the light load for minimal chance of overpenetration. If I had to trek through the wilderness I'd load the heavy heavy magnum rounds to deal with cats and bears. Now would I feel comfortable firing at a target between me and a buddy just because I had some light hollow point cartridges in my weapon? No. But I would be more likely to take the shot to save a life. Do you find this valuable? |
|
Sharpie41 |
6. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 11:45 AM EDT
"The FBI has a little to say about this subject, in their study on handgun wounding factors. I'll paraphrase it a bit. The full text is here, page 12...RFZD tried to say that my 20 gauge was over-powered and went on to say that he would go with at LEAST a pistol, whats more than a pistol in terms of range and power, a shotgun or rifle.. Overpenetration and splatter are less important to me then not putting someone/thing down Do you find this valuable? |
|
White76Knight |
7. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 11:52 AM EDT
"While I would like to use my shotgun as my primary weapon for Z-day, I KNOW I'll have my .357 with me, so I'll discuss it instead.Excellent strategy. Do you find this valuable? |
|
2WheeledSpeed |
8. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 11:55 AM EDT
"Overpenetration and splatter are less important to me then not putting someone/thing down"Exactly the way I see it. Also, never really heard anyone call a 20 Gauge "overpowered". A .410 the better option in his book? Do you find this valuable? |
|
White76Knight |
9. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 12:00 PM EDT
| Post edited: May 18 2011, 12:02 PM EDT
"Overpenetration and splatter are less important to me then not putting someone/thing down"Again, splatter aside, I agree but, in some cases, overpenetration can also be stated as overkill. For example, my primary weapon will be a .308 rifle, as I want it to have the capability of long range and knockdown power when used in the outdoors, whether firing at zeds, raiders or big game. In closer quarters, though, the .308 at near point blank range will be WAY more than is needed to put down most any target, but it's what I will probably be using nonetheless, by simple virtue of being the weapon that I am most likely to have in my hand at the time. Bearing this in mind, overpenetration is something that I'm going to have to very wary of. As I presume that I am not the only person who is likely to find themselves in this situation, I figure that the issue merits discussion. So has anyone else considered this? Do you find this valuable? |
|
Sharpie41 |
10. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 12:26 PM EDT
"Exactly the way I see it.Haha me neither. In close quarters I think a .308 IS overkill (CQB being indoors) but it is better than a knife... Do you find this valuable? |
|
White76Knight |
11. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 1:56 PM EDT
"In close quarters I think a .308 IS overkill (CQB being indoors) but it is better than a knife..."I agree completely, but again, in my case "it's what I will probably be using nonetheless, by simple virtue of being the weapon that I am most likely to have in my hand at the time." That's why overpenetration is a concern. To avoid overloading themselves, I really don't think most people are going to be carrying around two separate weapons in two separate calibers, one for indoors and one for outdoors. Where it is feasible to do so, the outdoors weapon will be used indoors, or at best most users will switch to a sidearm, and overpenetration with a sidearm can be just as much of a possibility as with a rifle, especially with FMJ rounds. Do you find this valuable? |
|
LastPariah |
12. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 8:48 PM EDT
Im no gun-expert but a .22 hollowpoint round will have nearly 0 chance of overpenetration.
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
ItsMrManCub |
13. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 8:52 PM EDT
"Im no gun-expert but a .22 hollowpoint round will have nearly 0 chance of overpenetration."Yes but what about under penetration. Do you find this valuable? |
|
Ready_For_Z-Day |
14. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 8:55 PM EDT
Baha, I was about to comment on this being from Hatchets. Good show.The thing about shotguns is the scatter, and unless you're up close and personal, you could hit your buddy or something dangerous (a canister of gasoline or something) and have a bad reaction with it. Do you find this valuable? |
|
John_234 |
15. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 9:11 PM EDT
"The FBI has a little to say about this subject, in their study on handgun wounding factors. I'll paraphrase it a bit. The full text is here, page 12...The FBI might not have had issues, but if I'm recalling correctly the NYPD had seventeen different incidents where FMJ bullets penetrated a perpetrator and hit a bystander. No unintended fatalities, but something was bound to go wrong, so they went to JHPs. Do you find this valuable? |
|
DLOWTHEMAD |
16. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 9:11 PM EDT
I been thinking, and digging a little. I can't find any case studies about over-penetration of handgun rounds causing fatalities. Doesn't mean it's not happened and not been lethal, or that hasn't happened elsewhere. It seems to me that most handgun rounds in JHP aren't gonna be in any shape to fly after exiting the first body, unless it was just a graze. FMJs on the other hand could be dangerous if they don't contact any bone, or if they are large caliber/high velocity. 12ga buck at point blank range may carry through with enough force to injure someone farther. Rifles, however, could be pretty dangerous. Alot of rifle rounds are small caliber high powered rounds. That combined with FMJ, which is fairly common, and you could have a real danger. Definitely always have to practice fire control. Trying to have the tool for the job couldn't hurt. If you only have a high powered rifle, you need to be point man, maybe, then at least anyone you engage will be away from any friendly targets. Do you find this valuable? |
|
John_234 |
17. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 18 2011, 9:22 PM EDT
Interesting thing is that a lightweight rifle round like a 55 grn 5.56mm will actually hit dry wall so fast it will explode and penetrate few layers at most - YMMV, of course. In some cases though, handguns have actually penetrated worse than rifles indoors because they don't have enough velocity to cause break up.Not to mention, a JHP can have it's nose filled up with sheetrock and other interfering materials, turning it into a FMJ. On my earlier point: http://www.thehighroad.org/archive/index.php/t-23762.html I can't find the original source of the NYPD report, but I've also read it in several books so I'm inclined to think it's fairly genuine. Interesting note - basically every user is dismissive of over-penetration because they assume FMJ is never going to be used - which is fairly understandable for low-volume self defense shooting. Do you find this valuable? |
|
chitoryu12 |
18. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 19 2011, 12:38 AM EDT
If your buddy is on the other side of a bad guy (whether it be through an ambush, bad planning, or what have you) he'll be in more danger from missed shots than overpenetration. He won't necessarily stay in the same spot while you try to take aim, and he may very well try to move around the opponent or dive for cover at the same time as a poorly aimed shot heads for the same spot as him.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
White76Knight |
19. RE: On accidental overpenetration by firearms...
May 19 2011, 9:05 AM EDT
"Yes but what about under penetration."At the kind of ranges I'm thinking about, even a .22 should get the job done but you might want to use FMJ's. Do you find this valuable? |