Location: Zombie Survival & Defense Wiki

Discussion: No guns, unless you really need themReported This is a featured thread

Showing 41 - 60 of 62  |  Show  posts at a time
Previous | 1 2 3 4 | Next
TreeLegs
TreeLegs
40. RE: No guns, unless you really need them
Feb 5 2012, 11:32 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 11:32 AM EST
"LOL - I like that test. Might have to try it some time.
"
Hey that's why short of serious martial arts training, I'd want someone on my team that is used to swinging melee items for a job. Butchers, roofers, lumberjack, auto body, welders, etc... all have to use items that would be considered melee weapons every day so I figure they would be ahead of the curve.
Do you find this valuable?    

mikechandler
41. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 5 2012, 11:57 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 11:57 AM EST
"There is a reason why military operators and law enforcement personnel are still trained in hand to hand combat, and still carry nightsticks and combat knives and the like."
True, but strive to keep deadly force confrontations limited to firearms, as the risk factor increases exponentially in HTH combat. I am prepared for it, and it's what I try to avoid through diligent use of my sidearm. My comment was aimed at those who recommend it as primary response, rather than the last resort and least desirable means, by postulating scenarios that really only could happen with zombies. In real life the scenarios dictated either end with a massive shootout, or if they are unarmed they run like hell, or surrender (depending on the circumstances). In a few cases doped up unarmed assailants might need some tazer medication.

In a true apocalyptic situation, the same rules will apply. Those with guns will be using them, those unarmed when encountering those armed will be subdued at gunpoint, because they still have functioning brains.

The lesson? Focus on getting armed and trained. And yes, include HTH training for worst case scenario... and remember that's why you should have a BUG anyway.
Do you find this valuable?    
White76Knight
White76Knight
42. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 5 2012, 12:43 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 12:43 PM EST
"True, but strive to keep deadly force confrontations limited to firearms, as the risk factor increases exponentially in HTH combat. I am prepared for it, and it's what I try to avoid through diligent use of my sidearm. My comment was aimed at those who recommend it as primary response, rather than the last resort and least desirable means, by postulating scenarios that really only could happen with zombies. In real life the scenarios dictated either end with a massive shootout, or if they are unarmed they run like h­ell, or surrender (depending on the circumstances). In a few cases doped up unarmed assailants might need some tazer medication.

In a true apocalyptic situation, the same rules will apply. Those with guns will be using them, those unarmed when encountering those armed will be subdued at gunpoint, because they still have functioning brains.

The lesson? Focus on getting armed and trained. And yes, include HTH training for worst case scenario... and remember that's why you should have a BUG anyway."
No particular argument here, but just remember where you are. The nature of this site is against you here, because like it or not, ZSDW stands for ZOMBIE Survival and Defense Wiki. So whether zombies are real or not, or whether they ever will be, becomes quite irrelevant, because they are the genre upon which this site is based. Many of our plans and scenarios will assume or rely on their existence because the members of this site generally find the idea of zombies to be entertaining, and there are certain more or less accepted conventions that go hand in hand with that.

I am curious, though: given the obvious nature of this site, if you are so vehemently opposed to anything that is only plausible if we assume the real world existence of a fictional being, then why are you on this site in the first place? There are plenty of other post apocalyptic disaster survival websites out there that generally don't even MENTION zombies, but anyone who chooses to be a member of this site has to accept the sites premise with a certain amount of grace, otherwise what's the point of being here?
Do you find this valuable?    

mikechandler
43. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 5 2012, 1:28 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 1:28 PM EST
I guess you didn't know that Zombie is a tactical euphemism; it's a polite way to discuss the real 2 legged threat in a SHTF situation. And there you have it, now YOU really do know everything.

It's fun and quite okay by me to take it the further step, and talk about zombies, sure... but as I said at the point it stops being relevant to you being prepared and trained for the actual and real threat that does exist, it's gone too far.

Nobody here has bought firearms to defend themselves from the Walking Dead (well, I certainly hope not).
Do you find this valuable?    
SasquatchJim
SasquatchJim
44. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 5 2012, 2:46 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 2:46 PM EST
"I guess you didn't know that Zombie is a tactical euphemism; it's a polite way to discuss the real 2 legged threat in a SHTF situation. And there you have it, now YOU really do know everything.

It's fun and quite okay by me to take it the further step, and talk about zombies, sure... but as I said at the point it stops being relevant to you being prepared and trained for the actual and real threat that does exist, it's gone too far.

Nobody here has bought firearms to defend themselves from the Walking Dead (well, I certainly hope not)."
Again, there are many members who like to discuss zombies fir fun. Discounting their posts on the basis of it being unrealistic doesn't really work, because as WK said, this IS a zombie-inclusive wiki.

Have I bought a gun for the purpose of fighting zombies? Of course not. Does that mean that I can't muse about what would happen if they were real? Of course not.

I don't really see why you're so ardently opposed to the zombie idea. It really seems like an actual survival wiki would be a better fit.
Do you find this valuable?    

rubb3rl3andman
45. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 5 2012, 5:23 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 5:23 PM EST
*Expecting the fox to make an appearance
Do you find this valuable?    
TreeLegs
TreeLegs
46. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 5 2012, 6:33 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 6:33 PM EST
If you break down what a Z-poc is all about, it comes out to being a highly destructive biological disaster. One bad enough to set the world back a couple hundred years. Since we are so relient technology(including medical, weapons, transportation and utilities) not having them presents issues that we haven't thought about in great detail for at least a century. Why not use the worst case scenario to base your planing on?

Long story short, if you can prepare for the Z-poc and the rebuilding process after, you'll be ready for almost anything.
Do you find this valuable?    
White76Knight
White76Knight
47. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 5 2012, 6:37 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 6:37 PM EST
"I don't really see why you're so ardently opposed to the zombie idea. It really seems like an actual survival wiki would be a better fit."
My thoughts precisely.
Do you find this valuable?    
John_234
John_234
48. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 5 2012, 7:15 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 7:15 PM EST
When your friend asks about your shotgun with fiber optic sights, tactical light and two hundred rounds of buckshot, your TLC Mosin Nagant sniper rifle project, or even that ridiculously tac'd out AR-15, it's just a lot easier to say, "zombies." Do you find this valuable?    

Nightwalk
49. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 5 2012, 7:36 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 7:36 PM EST
"I am bad at close combat, like most people. Distance is my friend, hence the use of a gun. A rifle is nice to have."
The best thing to do is get in shape. Hell, if the ZA happens and you're cooped up somewhere, working out is a great way to kill time.

Zombieland Rule #1: Cardio.

Do you find this valuable?    

Nightwalk
50. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 5 2012, 7:42 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 7:42 PM EST
"I know that young people without guns want to survive and they hate feeling like second rate survivalist because they often do not have access to firearms, ammo, real esatate, or buy the groceries to stockpile. Thus, we get comments about the inferiority of guns.

That is excusable ignorance and the desire not to feel helpless.

Rather than denegrate guns, however, think about what melee would really look like. Just like ammo is always tighter (and SLOWER to reload) than videogames, melee is also not an issue of either swinging until dead (nor 10 minute swordfights).

Much like olympic fencing rounds, most melee fights are over in a few seconds.

With zed coming at you full speed, you do not have much time to react.

Practice your side step. WIth most melee, you will want to sidestep, cripple, and then either run or kill. A blow to the head is only likely to get past the skull when the skull is on the ground. Otherwise, you are just knocking the head over to one side.

Crippling with a hamstring cut (edged) or a side of the knee smash (bludgeoning), will slow even a painless zombie enough to get away. If there is only one, it should fall forward (thus, the side step) letting you step on its back and take a "wood splitting" blow to the top-center-back of the skull (where the soft spot would be on a baby's skull).

Wash, rinse, repeat. This will also work on living targets whose desire is to tackle you.

I"
If the "young people without guns" are in shape and at least halfway intelligent, my money's on them.

All this survivalist and gun talk is great. What people forget, however, is that in our military you don't get through boot camp or OCS if you're out-of-shape and can't run five minutes without getting winded. Having a gun is half the battle. If you're not in shape, you're going to die.
Do you find this valuable?    
TreeLegs
TreeLegs
51. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 5 2012, 8:10 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 8:10 PM EST
"When your friend asks about your shotgun with fiber optic sights, tactical light and two hundred rounds of buckshot, your TLC Mosin Nagant sniper rifle project, or even that ridiculously tac'd out AR-15, it's just a lot easier to say, "zombies.""
True story lol
Do you find this valuable?    
John_234
John_234
52. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 5 2012, 8:24 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 8:24 PM EST
Somehow, I always imagine melee combat against zeds in some tight interior corridor, where footwork is a little bit more difficult to pull off. Do you find this valuable?    
White76Knight
White76Knight
53. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 5 2012, 8:34 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 8:34 PM EST
"When your friend asks about your shotgun with fiber optic sights, tactical light and two hundred rounds of buckshot, your TLC Mosin Nagant sniper rifle project, or even that ridiculously tac'd out AR-15, it's just a lot easier to say, "zombies.""
LOL - Exactly, it's just much faster to explain that way.
Do you find this valuable?    

mikechandler
54. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 5 2012, 8:49 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 8:49 PM EST
"My thoughts precisely.
"
Not surprised, LMAO. You don't like what I said, so I should leave. Go figure!

Nobody said I am OPPOSED to ZOMBIE IDEAS. It's you guys that are opposed to pulse blasters.

LOL.
Do you find this valuable?    
chitoryu12
chitoryu12
55. RE: No guns, unless you really need them
Feb 5 2012, 9:13 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 9:13 PM EST
"Hey everybody! Its ALMostFoul!

Us kids are sure glad you're back. Your optomistic, bright, shiny commentary is always like a breath of fresh air around here. I don't know how we've gotten along without you.

Welcome back!"
Wait, who the f*ck is this guy?
Do you find this valuable?    

mikechandler
56. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 5 2012, 9:37 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 9:37 PM EST
"If you break down what a Z-poc is all about, it comes out to being a highly destructive biological disaster. One bad enough to set the world back a couple hundred years. Since we are so relient technology(including medical, weapons, transportation and utilities) not having them presents issues that we haven't thought about in great detail for at least a century. Why not use the worst case scenario to base your planing on?

Long story short, if you can prepare for the Z-poc and the rebuilding process after, you'll be ready for almost anything. "
Unless you are taking it to the point that you decide you don't need guns, that a club is better than a gun. Which was this thread.

SURVIVORS WILL HAVE GUNS AND KNOW HOW TO USE THEM (and a whole lot more, for sure).
Do you find this valuable?    
Zee-Man
Zee-Man
57. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 5 2012, 11:48 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2012, 11:48 PM EST
"SURVIVORS WILL HAVE GUNS AND KNOW HOW TO USE THEM (and a whole lot more, for sure)."
And know how to reload ammo. Oh and how to make hulls and casings. Oh yeah, how to make primers and rimfires. Oh and how to make smokeless powder. Oh and the formula for perchlorate.

IIRR, the point of the OP was to conserve ammo.

"What is the point of wasting ammo on a few zombies"
"
If you are gonna use a gun i would go with at least a couple handguns"
"But still you should have something that doesn't require a limited supply of ammo"

Yep I Did RR.

Besides, you will find maybe a hundred other threads/posts in severe favor of firearms.

Survivors will have a full arsenal in their knowledge and be prepared to use even a pointy stick.
Do you find this valuable?    
TreeLegs
TreeLegs
58. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 6 2012, 12:13 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 6 2012, 12:13 AM EST
"
Survivors will have a full arsenal in their knowledge and be prepared to use even a pointy stick.
"
Why I like my Mosin with the classic wood stock. Out of ammo? Attach bayonet and voila! Big pointy stick lol.
Do you find this valuable?    
chitoryu12
chitoryu12
59. RE: No guns, unless you really need the
Feb 6 2012, 12:35 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 6 2012, 12:35 AM EST
I think a Mosin is really just a medieval spear with a gun barrel attached to the side. Do you find this valuable?    
Previous | 1 2 3 4 | Next

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)