Location: Handguns

Discussion: On Defensive Handgun CalibersReported This is a featured thread

Showing 21 - 40 of 93  |  Show  posts at a time
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next
TreeLegs
TreeLegs
20. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 12:45 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 12:45 AM EST
"You do realise that militaries use fmj because of stupidity and the hague convention, right? That is probably one of the stupidest things the military does. Hollow points are prefered by hunters because they kill better than fmj. In fact, the only bullets you can find in fmj are target bullets and match grade. My berger BT long range are fmj and it says right on the box "Not Suitable For Hunting" thats why I also have SST's"
I disagree about the stupid part. Kevlar has a better chance of stopping a HP because of the deformation on impacting the material, causing less of a chance of penetrating fully and the fibers catching on to edge of the tip while it is rotating. If it hit an actual plate in the armor, it would expand rapidly causing again a failure to penetrated and a posibility of not even cracking the plate to make follow up shots more effective.

It could also be argued, that not relying on expansion makes you rely on your skills and not the round. Since you have to preform a more acurate shot placement hit of the target to neutralize it, you kill the enemy quickly as you must aim at more vital structures.

You have to think of the targets you might encounter in combat as well. Shooting through a car door, windshields or other dense targets with FMJ, you increase your chances of a hit than with frangable or expanding ammo.

I consider HP's a second choice(close second by the way) because the distance from you and your target comes into play. HP's too close still can overpenetrate and not have time to expand inside the target. this applies to very fast velocity rounds as well. I shot a Raging Bull with .454 Casul HP's into a railroad tie at 30 yards and it didnt fully expand even though it almost went through. Shot it into a heavy duty oil filter and it cooked through with the same results..

Beside, two in the chest and one in the head never fails.
Do you find this valuable?    
Sharpie41
Sharpie41
21. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 1:01 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 1:01 AM EST
Well this thread is talking about handgun calibres, not too many (even FMJ) will penetrate.

What about alternating FMJ, HP, FMJ, HP etc
Do you find this valuable?    
John_234
John_234
22. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 1:16 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 1:19 AM EST
"But that's just the thing; according to this article, even these rounds are NOT man stoppers. Neither a .45ACP nor a .357Mag will reliably stop anyone if those shots do not hit in the right location in the first place, and the ONLY locations that are guaranteed do that in a "one shot drop" context are the brain and upper spinal column. From the article, "Absent that, incapacitation is subject to a host of variables, the most important of which are beyond the control of the shooter." So a hit anywhere else MAY drop an assailant where they stand, or it may cause them to fall down and bleed out a few seconds, minutes or even hours later, long after they've had time to do you in as well. "
No offense, but I think you're going crazy over a single source. Yes, the point is good and generally true, but you shouldn't really base all your points off a single article that sounds nice. Like any other subject, it's worth cross-referencing.

EDIT: Added some.
Do you find this valuable?    
White76Knight
White76Knight
23. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 2:05 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 2:05 AM EST
"No offense, but I think you're going crazy over a single source. Yes, the point is good and generally true, but you shouldn't really base all your points off a single article that sounds nice. Like any other subject, it's worth cross-referencing.

EDIT: Added some."
LOL - Oh you're quite right. I freely admit that I have a tendency to do that.

When I come across something that seems like good information, I tend to grab hold of it with both hands and not let go, every bit as determined as any zombie trying to eat your face... at least until something better or more interesting comes along. Witness also how hard I pushed the idea of Wood Gasifiers in the Vehicles thread. :o)

In all seriousness, though, despite how zealous I might come across I'm not suggesting that this article is the end all and be all of information concerning defensive handgun calibers, but to be honest I've always been a rifle guy. Until I started coming to this site, I knew nothing about handguns and never had the slightest interest in owning one (now there are at least four that I absolutely MUST have. LOL. Five if you count the .50AE Deagle with the 10" barrel, but that's neither for zombies or for self defense, I just think it would be cool to own). So for a guy with no previous experience, or even interest, in handguns this one article told me a lot that I didn't already know. For more experienced handgun users, it might all be old hat, or discredited entirely, but for me it was something new to get wound up about.
Do you find this valuable?    
TreeLegs
TreeLegs
24. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 2:06 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 2:06 AM EST
Just read the article(glad to know I already knew some of that stuff lol) and I agree with it. It is probably one of the best articles I read on the subject in some time. It's hard to argue with the information presented. If someone can find an article to the contrary, I'd enjoy reading it as well. Do you find this valuable?    
White76Knight
White76Knight
25. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 2:10 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 2:10 AM EST
LOL - There John, see... SEE.

Somebody else agrees with me, so the article MUST be right. JK, you know that right?
Do you find this valuable?    
John_234
John_234
26. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 2:27 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 2:27 AM EST
Don't get me wrong though, even though I'm harping on you for sources, the point is absolute true.

It's about shot placement, and that comes from mindset, training and partially equipment. And luck, in many occasions.

I still think caliber is important as far as all of that goes, though. Since humans do and will do tasks less than perfectly, having a weapon that has a proven track record may help if your shots aren't 100% perfect. Even if it's a miniscule advantage, it may just make the difference.
Do you find this valuable?    
White76Knight
White76Knight
27. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 2:48 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 2:48 AM EST
"Don't get me wrong though, even though I'm harping on you for sources, the point is absolute true.

It's about shot placement, and that comes from mindset, training and partially equipment. And luck, in many occasions.

I still think caliber is important as far as all of that goes, though. Since humans do and will do tasks less than perfectly, having a weapon that has a proven track record may help if your shots aren't 100% perfect. Even if it's a miniscule advantage, it may just make the difference."
Agreed, and for what it's worth, I think that's mentioned somewhere in the article as well... either there or elsewhere on the page where I found the article in the first place.
Do you find this valuable?    
Filadog
Filadog
28. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 6:22 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 6:22 AM EST
"It could also be argued, that not relying on expansion makes you rely on your skills and not the round. Since you have to preform a more acurate shot placement hit of the target to neutralize it, you kill the enemy quickly as you must aim at more vital structures.."
Hhuh ?

I sure don't see how shooting a less effective round is going to somehow make you a better more effective shot.
Has anyone in a gunfight ever thought.."Hey I got my pistol loaded with hydo shocks so no need to aim at more vital structures"
I think he will try to shoot just as well as if he was using the less effective FMJs

If I am using my handgun for defense, all things equal, I want it to be loaded with the most effective rounds I have
Do you find this valuable?    

problomatic
29. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 6:38 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 9:24 AM EST
If you're gonna kill something,don't half ass it, kill it the best you can.

But to agree with john, on a point where caliber is THE deciding factor... Look up the statistics of fatal gunshot wounds in the US. I think the .22LR had the lead for a few years running. Not because its the most lethal round, but because it was the most used. I'll have to dig around and see if I can't find that article again. Also, I was watching a police training video and they had another example. A guy had a major malfunction on a bolt rifle and the bolt was shot back into his groin/pelvis area. He didn't die even though the bolt penetrating his body was larger than any pistol caliber would be.
AND there was an infantry soldier shot at POINT BLANK RANGE in the face with a 9mm, who did not die. Didn't even realise he'd been shot. He rounded a corner and came face to face with an Iraqi who had a 9mm pistol up. The Iraqi shot him in the mouth, knocking out his two front teeth, but did not penetrate farther. The guy thought the Iraqi missed.

http://www.snopes.com/photos/military/teeth.asp

In the defense of 9mm a lot of Iraqi pistols are cheap knock-offs, and the barrels look like they are threaded with screw taps.

Shot placement, bullet selection, and cartridge selection are all important factors. No one more important than the other. The reason I differentiated cartridge selection and bullet selection is .223 is not much bigger caliber than .22LR and a .308 fmj will transfer less energy into a target than an expanding bullet in the same caliber.

While it is true HP's will not penetrate body armor; neither do most pistol rounds I don't worry about the bg breaking into my house wearing body armor and I don't worry about zombies wearing body armor either. Since I'm not looking to kill cops or soldiers, I think I'll be ok.
Do you find this valuable?    
Sharpie41
Sharpie41
30. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 9:48 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 9:48 AM EST
You think you'll only be facing zeds? Raiders, gang members etc? You don't think they'll operate after shtf? And do you not think they'll try and use armor if they find it? Do you find this valuable?    
White76Knight
White76Knight
31. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 10:02 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 10:02 AM EST
"You think you'll only be facing zeds? Raiders, gang members etc? You don't think they'll operate after shtf? And do you not think they'll try and use armor if they find it? "
Valid point, but by and large I think problomatic is right, the likelihood of encountering an armor wearing adversary in a self defense situation, while not impossible granted, is low enough that I wouldn't worry much about it either.
Do you find this valuable?    
Sharpie41
Sharpie41
32. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 10:47 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 10:51 AM EST
"Valid point, but by and large I think problomatic is right, the likelihood of encountering an armor wearing adversary in a self defense situation, while not impossible granted, is low enough that I wouldn't worry much about it either."
I disagree, with all the cops/soldiers killed/turned I think there will be a lot of raiders and gangsters using body armor (not to mention the availability of body armor now)

I think the chances are at least moderate
Do you find this valuable?    
White76Knight
White76Knight
33. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 1:00 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 1:00 PM EST
"I disagree, with all the cops/soldiers killed/turned I think there will be a lot of raiders and gangsters using body armor (not to mention the availability of body armor now)

I think the chances are at least moderate"
Good point, but then if they were zombies you'd have to shoot em in the head anyway, so armor would be a moot point for the ones who were turned.

As for armor scavenged by raiders off the bodies of those slain, however, you're probably right about that part. That might be worth further consideration.
Do you find this valuable?    

problomatic
34. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 1:39 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 1:39 PM EST
"I disagree, with all the cops/soldiers killed/turned I think there will be a lot of raiders and gangsters using body armor (not to mention the availability of body armor now)

I think the chances are at least moderate"
http://www.angelfire.com/art/enchanter/pigboard.html

Basically they did a test of different calibers and types of ammo in those calibers against human cadavers (armored and unarmored), pigs, and ballistic gellatin. With the results.

May learn you a thing or two, and suprise a few others, as it suprised me.
Do you find this valuable?    
TreeLegs
TreeLegs
35. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 2:02 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 2:02 PM EST
"Hhuh ?

I sure don't see how shooting a less effective round is going to somehow make you a better more effective shot.
Has anyone in a gunfight ever thought.."Hey I got my pistol loaded with hydo shocks so no need to aim at more vital structures"
I think he will try to shoot just as well as if he was using the less effective FMJs

If I am using my handgun for defense, all things equal, I want it to be loaded with the most effective rounds I have "
For beginners to the firearm world or people that watch too many movies, yeah I've heard that before. Most of us here are all very knowledgable about firearms, but there are some younger members that might get the wrong impression. That HP's are going to be the deciding factor in a gunfight is a dangerous fallacy. It's about shot placement and penetration are what kills first. Expansion and wound cavity second.

New shooters need to focus and rely on their skills not tech.
Do you find this valuable?    
John_234
John_234
36. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 2:05 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 2:05 PM EST
Handguns are bad against armor. But you do what you have to do. Even with armor on, getting shot sucks.

Traditionally, there's been the Mozambique drill - if rounds to the chest don't work, rock up and shoot them in the head. As of late, people have also favored shooting for the pelvic girdle. Due to body mechanics, the pelvis is a mostly stable target compared to a swaying torso or head, and it's very fragile considering. Unless they're rocking a military carrier with flak pads, it'll be effective.

But then again, the purpose of a pistol is to fight your way to a rifle anyway, so hopefully your handful of accurately-lobbed bullets will buy you time to cut through their armor with a rifle.
Do you find this valuable?    
Sharpie41
Sharpie41
37. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 2:12 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 2:12 PM EST
"http://www.angelfire.com/art/enchanter/pigboard.html

Basically they did a test of different calibers and types of ammo in those calibers against human cadavers (armored and unarmored), pigs, and ballistic gellatin. With the results.

May learn you a thing or two, and suprise a few others, as it suprised me.
"
Might have to take a look when I get to a computer
Do you find this valuable?    
White76Knight
White76Knight
38. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 3:29 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 3:44 PM EST
"Handguns are bad against armor. But you do what you have to do. Even with armor on, getting shot sucks.

Traditionally, there's been the Mozambique drill - if rounds to the chest don't work, rock up and shoot them in the head. As of late, people have also favored shooting for the pelvic girdle. Due to body mechanics, the pelvis is a mostly stable target compared to a swaying torso or head, and it's very fragile considering. Unless they're rocking a military carrier with flak pads, it'll be effective.

But then again, the purpose of a pistol is to fight your way to a rifle anyway, so hopefully your handful of accurately-lobbed bullets will buy you time to cut through their armor with a rifle."
Using the pistol to fight your way to a rifle doesn't work in a CCW situation. There IS no rifle, the pistol is all you have, so you have to choose that pistol and it's ammo accordingly, and shoot accordingly.
Do you find this valuable?    
TreeLegs
TreeLegs
39. RE: On Defensive Handgun Calibers
Feb 8 2012, 5:00 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 8 2012, 5:00 PM EST
"http://www.angelfire.com/art/enchanter/pigboard.html

Basically they did a test of different calibers and types of ammo in those calibers against human cadavers (armored and unarmored), pigs, and ballistic gellatin. With the results.

May learn you a thing or two, and suprise a few others, as it suprised me.
"
I love the fact that ya'll do a lot of the research for me lol. You guys really know how to find the dirt I tell ya.

Great article. Thanks for digging it up prob.
Do you find this valuable?    
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)