Location: null

Discussion: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?Reported This is a featured thread

Showing 161 - 180 of 264  |  Show  posts at a time
First < Previous | 6 7 8 9 10 | Next > Last
epic_epicness
epic_epicness
160. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 9 2012, 4:53 PM EDT | Post edited: May 9 2012, 4:53 PM EDT
"Ahh, thought you were calling ACR a moron.

Agree, a .45 to the arm would be less effective than a .22 to the head"
I could argue this with case facts sharpie but since you are trying to convey a general message that I agree with I will leave you alone.
Do you find this valuable?    
Sharpie41
Sharpie41
161. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 9 2012, 6:45 PM EDT | Post edited: May 9 2012, 6:45 PM EDT
"I could argue this with case facts sharpie but since you are trying to convey a general message that I agree with I will leave you alone."
How?

If you got hit in the arm with a .45, yes it would hurt and you would probably fall down in pain, but you could still pick up a gun with the other hand and shoot back. But a .22 to the head would permanently prevent you from picking up a weapon
Do you find this valuable?    
epic_epicness
epic_epicness
162. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 9 2012, 8:35 PM EDT | Post edited: May 9 2012, 8:35 PM EDT
"How?

If you got hit in the arm with a .45, yes it would hurt and you would probably fall down in pain, but you could still pick up a gun with the other hand and shoot back. But a .22 to the head would permanently prevent you from picking up a weapon "
for the simple sake of FYI, no argument intended ok.

the arm carries several large muscles on your body and is also the area of your most difficult and complex appendages (your fingers) meaning that you have a very large amount of nerves and arteries compacted into a small space. with a nearly half inch bullet placed around the shoulder area you would sever an artery, and severely damage if not destroy your entire peripheral nervous system along with a high chance of rupturing your brachial nerve complex.
in short you will shut down and bleed out.

I have argued the effectiveness of a .22 on the human skull many times on this thread and showed the pictures of it in my classes on PowerPoint so I'm not going to revisit that thread again as it was widely unpopular the first time.

Regardless of two dimensional research and boring facts you are still right Sharpie. one in the head is well worth two in the chest.
Do you find this valuable?    
Sharpie41
Sharpie41
163. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 9 2012, 8:49 PM EDT | Post edited: May 9 2012, 8:49 PM EDT
"for the simple sake of FYI, no argument intended ok.

the arm carries several large muscles on your body and is also the area of your most difficult and complex appendages (your fingers) meaning that you have a very large amount of nerves and arteries compacted into a small space. with a nearly half inch bullet placed around the shoulder area you would sever an artery, and severely damage if not destroy your entire peripheral nervous system along with a high chance of rupturing your brachial nerve complex.
in short you will shut down and bleed out.

I have argued the effectiveness of a .22 on the human skull many times on this thread and showed the pictures of it in my classes on PowerPoint so I'm not going to revisit that thread again as it was widely unpopular the first time.

Regardless of two dimensional research and boring facts you are still right Sharpie. one in the head is well worth two in the chest. "
Yes but it would take awhile to bleed out. But yeah there will probably be nerve damage
Do you find this valuable?    
LWJ2009
LWJ2009
164. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 9 2012, 10:21 PM EDT | Post edited: May 9 2012, 10:21 PM EDT
"How?

If you got hit in the arm with a .45, yes it would hurt and you would probably fall down in pain, but you could still pick up a gun with the other hand and shoot back. But a .22 to the head would permanently prevent you from picking up a weapon "
He he he If I hit you in the arm with one of my .45 JHP you could kiss that sucker goodbye. How would you pick up that weapon if you were going into shock Sharpie? I remember when I got mangled I was quite useless after about 5 mintues, my only focus was to not black out again. Oh btw if you nick an artery and do not treat that ASAP it does not take long to bleed out my friend.
Do you find this valuable?    
Redrighthand
Redrighthand
165. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 9 2012, 10:44 PM EDT | Post edited: May 9 2012, 10:58 PM EDT
"Not to offend anyone, but I think people need to stop being so fixated with Cooper. He came up with great firearms techniques, and some awesome philosophy, but some of his stuff IS a tad outdated (No offense to Cooper or his teachings)
A lot of what Cooper said and taught is still very relevant today, heck most of it is. However contrary to Cooper's opinion 9mm is a dandy self defense round, and while I still view it as underpowered the .223 is still a decent man stopping round. People need to under stand that Cooper was a product of his day, and in his day the M14 and the 1911 were the bread and butter of the classy shooter, and that modern ballistic technology wasn't where it is today where a 9mm can be pretty darn lethal (by handgun standards).


"
Say what you want about Cooper, though (and I don't disagree with you entirely), but here on this thread, we've got guys inspired by the scout concept to get a long range hunting rifle on one hand, and bull-pup assault rifles on the other! Which means that he must have been onto *something*! :)

As for the .223, every Australian Vietnam (probably a half dozen or so over the years) vet I've spoken to is quite derisive of the 5.56, as they were using (essentially) FN FAL's in 7.62 back then. It's an old guy thing, I think - but interestingly our troops are now getting back into 7.62 battle rifles for the extra range in Afghanistan (for our Designated Marksman Rifle, SR-25's & HK417 IIRC). I think there's a clearly a case for both in modern combat - or we'd be converting to 7.62 en masse.
Edit: ommission of name.
Do you find this valuable?    
Sharpie41
Sharpie41
166. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 9 2012, 11:53 PM EDT | Post edited: May 9 2012, 11:53 PM EDT
"He he he If I hit you in the arm with one of my .45 JHP you could kiss that sucker goodbye. How would you pick up that weapon if you were going into shock Sharpie? I remember when I got mangled I was quite useless after about 5 mintues, my only focus was to not black out again. Oh btw if you nick an artery and do not treat that ASAP it does not take long to bleed out my friend."
How long would it take for shock to set in? You mentioned five minutes so I'll use that as a baseline, using the other hand you could do a lot of damage in less than 5 minutes.

What happened to you?
Do you find this valuable?    
Sharpie41
Sharpie41
167. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 9 2012, 11:57 PM EDT | Post edited: May 9 2012, 11:57 PM EDT
"Say what you want about Cooper, though (and I don't disagree with you entirely), but here on this thread, we've got guys inspired by the scout concept to get a long range hunting rifle on one hand, and bull-pup assault rifles on the other! Which means that he must have been onto *something*! :)

As for the .223, every Australian Vietnam (probably a half dozen or so over the years) vet I've spoken to is quite derisive of the 5.56, as they were using (essentially) FN FAL's in 7.62 back then. It's an old guy thing, I think - but interestingly our troops are now getting back into 7.62 battle rifles for the extra range in Afghanistan (for our Designated Marksman Rifle, SR-25's & HK417 IIRC). I think there's a clearly a case for both in modern combat - or we'd be converting to 7.62 en masse.
Edit: ommission of name."
Yeah only for supplimental issue, main issue rifle will be .223 for the foreseeable future.

They should field a calibre in between 5.56 and 7.62
Do you find this valuable?    
11ACRBlackhorse
11ACRBlackhorse
168. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 10 2012, 3:37 AM EDT | Post edited: May 10 2012, 3:37 AM EDT
"Yeah only for supplimental issue, main issue rifle will be .223 for the foreseeable future.

They should field a calibre in between 5.56 and 7.62"
That's why they developed the 6.5 & 6.8 rounds but leaning towards the 6.8 for better barrier/cover penetration. But the Iraq and Afghan wars have put it on hold since combat isn't the place to transition weapons, ammo, and associated gear. Plus combat isn't the place to iron out any teething issues with associated new weapon systems.
Do you find this valuable?    

AaronMullins
169. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 10 2012, 7:47 AM EDT | Post edited: May 10 2012, 7:47 AM EDT
"That's cool Soldat. I'd love to see pics, that sounds like a pretty sweet rig. What mount did you use for that Hendsolt optic?"
i will get some pics up when i get back stateside. it's a fun rifle to shoot. but it really isnt that accurate. i think it is my fault. when i orderede the barrel i got the specs i wrong. i mounted the barrel, and i think that is why it only shoots about 2 to 2.5 moa. even with a great barrel. the mount for the scope came from an L42 i think, it came with the original rifle. which actuallly shot better i think. oh, well, it was one of my first homebuilt projects.
Do you find this valuable?    
LWJ2009
LWJ2009
170. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 10 2012, 8:04 AM EDT | Post edited: May 10 2012, 8:04 AM EDT
"How long would it take for shock to set in? You mentioned five minutes so I'll use that as a baseline, using the other hand you could do a lot of damage in less than 5 minutes.

What happened to you?"
My leg was shattered, from the kneecap down to my ankle. It depends on the person as well Sharpie, it is not so simple to just say your going to switch hands and carry on the fight. Your also forgetting the fact that the .45 was not meant to just be shrugged off, it was developed to put people down. If I nail you with a 165 grain JHP in the shoulder or arm, do you really think your not going to try to stop the bleeding and apply pressure with your free arm? Or at least attempt to preform first aid on upon your self? If you try to carry on the fight with your non dominant hand how accurate and useful do you really think you will be?
Do you find this valuable?    
LJ126
LJ126
171. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 10 2012, 8:48 AM EDT | Post edited: May 10 2012, 8:49 AM EDT
"i will get some pics up when i get back stateside. it's a fun rifle to shoot. but it really isnt that accurate. i think it is my fault. when i orderede the barrel i got the specs i wrong. i mounted the barrel, and i think that is why it only shoots about 2 to 2.5 moa. even with a great barrel. the mount for the scope came from an L42 i think, it came with the original rifle. which actuallly shot better i think. oh, well, it was one of my first homebuilt projects."
Banned for multiple accounts, especially since in your UberSoldat account, you were repeatedly rude to people.
Do you find this valuable?    
LWJ2009
LWJ2009
172. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 10 2012, 9:16 AM EDT | Post edited: May 10 2012, 9:16 AM EDT
"That's why they developed the 6.5 & 6.8 rounds but leaning towards the 6.8 for better barrier/cover penetration. But the Iraq and Afghan wars have put it on hold since combat isn't the place to transition weapons, ammo, and associated gear. Plus combat isn't the place to iron out any teething issues with associated new weapon systems."
Not to mention the cost of of switching calibers for the US Armed forces as a whole... That would be billions of dollars down the drain to replace the 5.56.
Do you find this valuable?    
Sharpie41
Sharpie41
173. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 10 2012, 9:22 AM EDT | Post edited: May 10 2012, 9:22 AM EDT
"My leg was shattered, from the kneecap down to my ankle. It depends on the person as well Sharpie, it is not so simple to just say your going to switch hands and carry on the fight. Your also forgetting the fact that the .45 was not meant to just be shrugged off, it was developed to put people down. If I nail you with a 165 grain JHP in the shoulder or arm, do you really think your not going to try to stop the bleeding and apply pressure with your free arm? Or at least attempt to preform first aid on upon your self? If you try to carry on the fight with your non dominant hand how accurate and useful do you really think you will be? "
Yeah but what happened? Serving overseas?

If my life was in danger I would fight on, then get medical attention.

I'm reasonably accurate with my left, not as accurate but I can at least hit my target
Do you find this valuable?    
Sharpie41
Sharpie41
174. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 10 2012, 9:23 AM EDT | Post edited: May 10 2012, 9:23 AM EDT
"Not to mention the cost of of switching calibers for the US Armed forces as a whole... That would be billions of dollars down the drain to replace the 5.56."
They should sell the uppers to civvies as surplus, and the ammo too, that would even out the cost
Do you find this valuable?    
11ACRBlackhorse
11ACRBlackhorse
175. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 10 2012, 10:42 AM EDT | Post edited: May 10 2012, 10:42 AM EDT
"Not to mention the cost of of switching calibers for the US Armed forces as a whole... That would be billions of dollars down the drain to replace the 5.56."
Even worse if some of brass get what they want. They think it should replace not just the 556 platforms but the 762 platforms too. Minus of course the sniper systems and other specialty systems.
Doubt it will happen for a long time considering whom is the Prez and especially with our budget issues. Be lucky if they even replace the worn out platforms already in service.
Do you find this valuable?    
LWJ2009
LWJ2009
176. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 10 2012, 11:41 AM EDT | Post edited: May 10 2012, 11:41 AM EDT
"Yeah but what happened? Serving overseas?

If my life was in danger I would fight on, then get medical attention.

I'm reasonably accurate with my left, not as accurate but I can at least hit my target
"
It happend serving Uncle Suger, when I was 20 Sharpie. All I can say is God Bless Kevlar because I should have been dead or at the least more crippled then I am now. You might also expire or also be unable to find medical attention before the fight is over.
Do you find this valuable?    
Sharpie41
Sharpie41
177. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 10 2012, 11:54 AM EDT | Post edited: May 10 2012, 11:54 AM EDT
"It happend serving Uncle Suger, when I was 20 Sharpie. All I can say is God Bless Kevlar because I should have been dead or at the least more crippled then I am now. You might also expire or also be unable to find medical attention before the fight is over. "
Holy shît, I turn 20 in less than a month, I can't imagine being wounded like that.

True, my point is people could still get up and fight with a .45 to the arm
Do you find this valuable?    
LWJ2009
LWJ2009
178. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 10 2012, 12:11 PM EDT | Post edited: May 10 2012, 12:11 PM EDT
"They should sell the uppers to civvies as surplus, and the ammo too, that would even out the cost "
Only the Semi Auto's would be sold, fully auto is a no no. It might take a bite out of the cost but your not going to fully recoup your losses either. Besides in this age of budget pressure it is just not feasable to rid the inventory of the 5.56.
Do you find this valuable?    
LWJ2009
LWJ2009
179. RE: Scout Rifles - "Swiss Army Knife" of Guns or Poor Compromise?
May 10 2012, 12:12 PM EDT | Post edited: May 10 2012, 12:12 PM EDT
"Holy shît, I turn 20 in less than a month, I can't imagine being wounded like that.

True, my point is people could still get up and fight with a .45 to the arm"
Sharpie how much meat is on your arm?
Do you find this valuable?    
First < Previous | 6 7 8 9 10 | Next > Last

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)