Location: null

Discussion: Basic Combat/Defense ConceptsReported This is a featured thread

Showing 61 - 80 of 82  |  Show  posts at a time
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next
wantmarmite
wantmarmite
60. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 25 2012, 11:14 AM EDT | Post edited: Jun 25 2012, 11:14 AM EDT
"Yes, I've used it successfully in a real life situation.

In this instance grappling worked because he didn't have any buddies with him to hit me again, and he wasn't using a gun. It was just some junkie with a pipe. "
Good to know.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
demsmine
demsmine
61. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 25 2012, 4:09 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 25 2012, 4:09 PM EDT
Grappling is an amazing way to incapacitate an attacker. You show a guy the definition of ground and pound and they will no longer want to play. As for multiple attackers, realistically barring the simple fact that fighting while standing makes it easier to run away, no matter what you do you are at a serious disadvantage.

It really is shocking what a well trained person can do from their back. I am a pretty good sized individual 5'11 290lbs and bench press around 370 give or take depending on the day. And I have been made an utter fool by 165 pound man that knew his sh!t when it came to BJJ. The whole point of Jits is to equalize hand to hand fighting. It's really hard to be a tough while whimpering in an armbar.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
=jesse=
=jesse=
62. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 25 2012, 4:18 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 25 2012, 4:18 PM EDT
"Grappling is an amazing way to incapacitate an attacker. You show a guy the definition of ground and pound and they will no longer want to play. As for multiple attackers, realistically barring the simple fact that fighting while standing makes it easier to run away, no matter what you do you are at a serious disadvantage.

It really is shocking what a well trained person can do from their back. I am a pretty good sized individual 5'11 290lbs and bench press around 370 give or take depending on the day. And I have been made an utter fool by 165 pound man that knew his sh!t when it came to BJJ. The whole point of Jits is to equalize hand to hand fighting. It's really hard to be a tough while whimpering in an armbar."
hahaha, I hear ya man. I went in at 5'10 170. I got triangled by some scrawny little squirt of a man. Talk about a tough pill to swallow, lol. All those muscles and I couldn't do a damn thing.

Not to go too far off topic, but I think bjj is a great martial art as an anti-rape method. There is so much focus on learning what to do from your back, not to mention learning what to do when you've got someone on your back.
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
wantmarmite
wantmarmite
63. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 25 2012, 7:23 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 25 2012, 7:23 PM EDT
"hahaha, I hear ya man. I went in at 5'10 170. I got triangled by some scrawny little squirt of a man. Talk about a tough pill to swallow, lol. All those muscles and I couldn't do a damn thing.

Not to go too far off topic, but I think bjj is a great martial art as an anti-rape method. There is so much focus on learning what to do from your back, not to mention learning what to do when you've got someone on your back."
370? I'm proud of myself when I can bench press 100lbs. Somehow being a woman doesn't make me feel any less of a wimp when there's a 270lb difference. I'm 145lbs and I've never managed to bench press my own body weight.
Do you find this valuable?    
demsmine
demsmine
64. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 26 2012, 2:42 AM EDT | Post edited: Jun 26 2012, 2:42 AM EDT
"370? I'm proud of myself when I can bench press 100lbs. Somehow being a woman doesn't make me feel any less of a wimp when there's a 270lb difference. I'm 145lbs and I've never managed to bench press my own body weight."
Dudes get caught up in the numbers, it often reminds me of this old SNL skit.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3x98hJWapw

sorry about the quality,

Really, lifting weights isn't the best why to get more "fighting strength". It helps, but isn't necessary. Now if i could only lose 50 lbs, just started cutting bad carbs and upping the cardio.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
wantmarmite
wantmarmite
65. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 26 2012, 8:26 AM EDT | Post edited: Jun 26 2012, 8:26 AM EDT
"Dudes get caught up in the numbers, it often reminds me of this old SNL skit.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3x98hJWapw

sorry about the quality,

Really, lifting weights isn't the best why to get more "fighting strength". It helps, but isn't necessary. Now if i could only lose 50 lbs, just started cutting bad carbs and upping the cardio."
lol! The chicken legs are hysterical.

It's enough to make me pause for thought. I got put off increasing my upper body strength. My arms just look more and more like Olive from Popeye than Linda Hamilton lol. When you work hard on something, don't you want something to show for it?

I think like most women, it's easy to shrug it off and spend too much time on cardio.
Do you find this valuable?    
=jesse=
=jesse=
66. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 26 2012, 10:55 AM EDT | Post edited: Jun 26 2012, 10:55 AM EDT
Want pretty much hit it on the head for me. Enough workouts and you do want to have something to show for it. My mindset has changed though a bit since I stopped competing.

For instance now I focus a lot more on pec workouts, pretty much because it looks good. Actual application of pecs in a fight though isn't much. If you look at most fighters, they have relatively flat chests. Shoulders, abs, and back play a much bigger role.
Do you find this valuable?    
LJ126
LJ126
67. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 26 2012, 11:51 AM EDT | Post edited: Jun 26 2012, 11:52 AM EDT
Actually, after reading this, I feel a disagree with a lot of what others have posted.

Personally, I would discourage people from getting overly invested in grappling for self defense. And this is coming from me, and most of my training and experience is in Judo (and a short stint of high school wrestling.) Fortunately, I've learned other stuff too, which is why I'm suggesting something different.

The problem with taking it to the ground - and keeping it there - is that if whomever you're fighting with has buddies around, the last place you want to be is on the ground. Even if you're in a position of authority over your initially attacker, you're at a huge disadvantage when his boys get there. They're going to play soccer with your head.

I'd suggest that people keep it simple. Gross motor skill strikes, and stay off the ground. If it goes to the ground - which it will - get up FAST. If you're on your feet and the other guy isn't, you're at a distinct advantage. Shoves; trips; simple takedowns; palm, knee, elbow strikes; very low kicks and stomps; biting and gouging - simple and effective techniques that don't rely on you being stronger than the other guy or precise application on small body targets. And, because they're not your typical streetfight fare, most people won't see these strikes coming - unlike the wide haymaker that seems to make it's way into every drunk fistfight.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
wantmarmite
wantmarmite
68. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 26 2012, 12:02 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 26 2012, 12:02 PM EDT
Wide haymaker? Do you find this valuable?    
=jesse=
=jesse=
69. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 26 2012, 12:07 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 26 2012, 12:07 PM EDT
"Wide haymaker?"
Think when some knuckle head drops his fist almost by his hip, and then makes a wide arching loop with his arm stretched out.
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
=jesse=
=jesse=
70. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 26 2012, 12:10 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 26 2012, 12:10 PM EDT
Which posts are you referring to LJ? I thought what you said more or less matched what was being said. From what I saw on this page and the last, me, damage and dems said grappling only really works with a 1v1 situation. I think someone else mentioned it too.

Your last paragraph I agree with completely....as does Bas Rutten ;) If it's some drunk juice head and his buddies, go dirty.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
LJ126
LJ126
71. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 26 2012, 12:34 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 26 2012, 12:34 PM EDT
"Which posts are you referring to LJ? I thought what you said more or less matched what was being said. From what I saw on this page and the last, me, damage and dems said grappling only really works with a 1v1 situation. I think someone else mentioned it too."
Let me rephrase; maybe disagreement isn't the right word.

It seems that the discussion has been very "grappling" oriented, and hasn't really discussed striking or gross motor skill responses at all. The amusing part is that while both systems requires some training, proficiency in grappling takes tons of time, whereas the latter can be taught to proficiency quickly. And it's effective because it could be argued that most formal martial arts are not natural responses, but gross motor skill techniques are. I'm not saying that grappling doesn't have a place, but for self-defense, I think we're probably overemphasizing it a bit.

I dunno. I don't know how to put to words exactly what I'm thinking. It's really frustrating when I have mornings like this; I think I need some coffee!
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
LJ126
LJ126
72. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 26 2012, 12:42 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 26 2012, 12:42 PM EDT
"Wide haymaker?"
What Jesse said!

It's essentially when someone slings their whole right arm out to one side like a baseball bat, aimed at your face. It has a similar flight pattern to a hook, but is much slower and less precise. It's the signature punch of an untrained scrapper.

To be honest, it's really nasty if it hits you (because the entire body weight is thrown into the punch) but it's incredibly easy to spot coming and either dodge by ducking or stepping inside of the punch, or by blocking and counter-striking.
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
demsmine
demsmine
73. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 26 2012, 3:15 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 26 2012, 3:15 PM EDT
I think when should address the matter that when in a verbal confrontation never feel the need to stick your chest out, with hands to the side and your highly vulnerable throat blowing in the breeze. It amazes me how many douche bag idiots go to talk smack to each other in this ape like posture. It has to be something from the primitive part of our brain. 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
=jesse=
=jesse=
74. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 26 2012, 4:10 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 26 2012, 4:10 PM EDT
"Let me rephrase; maybe disagreement isn't the right word.

It seems that the discussion has been very "grappling" oriented, and hasn't really discussed striking or gross motor skill responses at all. The amusing part is that while both systems requires some training, proficiency in grappling takes tons of time, whereas the latter can be taught to proficiency quickly. And it's effective because it could be argued that most formal martial arts are not natural responses, but gross motor skill techniques are. I'm not saying that grappling doesn't have a place, but for self-defense, I think we're probably overemphasizing it a bit.

I dunno. I don't know how to put to words exactly what I'm thinking. It's really frustrating when I have mornings like this; I think I need some coffee!"
I hear you. Actually what you said about not getting overly invested makes a lot of sense too. At least in my opinion, not being overly invested keeps you flexible and adaptable to different situations.

If you look at just the UFC, you've got guys like Demian Maia. Absolutely stellar ground skills...but if you avoid his take down, there isn't a whole lot else to his game.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
vampirejediknight
vampirejediknight
75. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 26 2012, 4:12 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 26 2012, 4:12 PM EDT
So, here's my question: is it better to have formal, clean training or raw, real-life experience? Obviously, the better choice legally and health-wise is formal training, but I'm just wondering, can a person with formal training take down most street thugs easily, or do experienced street fighters tend to out-dirty the professionally trained? Do you find this valuable?    
vampirejediknight
vampirejediknight
76. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 26 2012, 4:19 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 26 2012, 4:19 PM EDT
"I think when should address the matter that when in a verbal confrontation never feel the need to stick your chest out, with hands to the side and your highly vulnerable throat blowing in the breeze. It amazes me how many douche bag idiots go to talk smack to each other in this ape like posture. It has to be something from the primitive part of our brain."
I know what you mean, sort of. If I felt threatened, most of the time I could hit someone in that posture with a nice, solid hand to the throat, which, no matter how it's delivered, is pretty damn effective with much force behind it. Next, a good kick to the privates should do it.

To address LJ's comment, I agree that grappling is not the best thing to focus on. . . why don't you do some talking about gross motor skills? I'm intereted to hear the rest your take on everything
Do you find this valuable?    
=jesse=
=jesse=
77. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 26 2012, 4:21 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 26 2012, 4:21 PM EDT
"So, here's my question: is it better to have formal, clean training or raw, real-life experience? Obviously, the better choice legally and health-wise is formal training, but I'm just wondering, can a person with formal training take down most street thugs easily, or do experienced street fighters tend to out-dirty the professionally trained?"
That's a good question. It's kind of like asking is it better to have a pistol or rifle. Depends on the shooter, depends on the situation, etc. etc.

In the early days in UFC, Tank Abbot was just a brawler who stomped all the 'formally trained guys'. None of them were used to having somebody really come after them.

Then you get someone like Royce Gracie who is formally trained, and cleaned house.

Formal training in my opinion is absolutely essential. It sets the ground work, ensures good basics, etc. But even in a training environment, you need to experience someone coming in at 100%. You can practice arm locks and tosses and throws all day, but until you know what it's like to have someone throw 5 or 6 punches in a matter of a few seconds, it's hard to determine what really works for you and what doesn't.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
wantmarmite
wantmarmite
78. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 26 2012, 4:29 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 26 2012, 4:29 PM EDT
"So, here's my question: is it better to have formal, clean training or raw, real-life experience? Obviously, the better choice legally and health-wise is formal training, but I'm just wondering, can a person with formal training take down most street thugs easily, or do experienced street fighters tend to out-dirty the professionally trained?"
Depends on the real life experience and on the person. And it depends on the training and on the person.

Real life experience could be a couple of HS's posturing in the school yard with lame punches anyone could dodge.
Formal training could be a mcdojo turning out black belts on a conveyor belt.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
=jesse=
=jesse=
79. RE: Basic Combat/Defense Concepts
Jun 26 2012, 4:41 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 26 2012, 4:41 PM EDT
Little fun fact for the readers here.

When I first got involved in mma, they gave me a little test. Now understand that this isn't a scientific test...this is a test designed by people who punch people in the head for a living.

Close your eyes and relax your body. Have someone in front of you lightly push you by your shoulders.

If you resist the push and press your body forward, you're more suited for a striking martial art.

If you flow with it and lean your body back, you're more suited for a grappling style.
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next